2019
DOI: 10.1002/1438-390x.1030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular discrimination and phylogeographic patterns of clones of the parthenogenetic gecko Lepidodactylus lugubris in the Japanese Archipelago

Abstract: Vertebrates usually reproduce sexually in which males and females contribute their offspring genome and produce genetically diverse offspring. However, some of them are asexual without genetic contribution from males. The nocturnal gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris, is all females and reproduces parthenogenetically. This gecko is known to consist of diploid and triploid clones in the tropical and subtropical regions, which can be identified by their dorsal marking patterns, ploidy, and protein polymorphism. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, L. moestus and L. pantai are both known from several of the small islands in the Caroline Islands and Palau Islands; therefore, these represent alternative potential locations of hybrid origin for additional L. lugubris clones (Buden & Taborosi 2016). Given the number of unique parthenogenetic lineages of L. lugubris (Ineich 1988;Ineich & Ota 1992;Yamashiro et al 2000), it is likely that hybridization of different bisexual parental ancestors gave rise to numerous diploid and triploid clones and some have subsequently been introduced elsewhere (Radtkey et al 1995;Ineich 1999;Ineich et al 2015), whereas others remain restricted to small original islets (Murakami & Hayashi 2019;Yamashiro et al 2000). In addition, backcrossing and/or potential hybridization with other species is likely to have occurred to produce multiple diploid and triploid clones (Saint Girons & Ineich 1992;Buden et al 2014;Trifonov et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, L. moestus and L. pantai are both known from several of the small islands in the Caroline Islands and Palau Islands; therefore, these represent alternative potential locations of hybrid origin for additional L. lugubris clones (Buden & Taborosi 2016). Given the number of unique parthenogenetic lineages of L. lugubris (Ineich 1988;Ineich & Ota 1992;Yamashiro et al 2000), it is likely that hybridization of different bisexual parental ancestors gave rise to numerous diploid and triploid clones and some have subsequently been introduced elsewhere (Radtkey et al 1995;Ineich 1999;Ineich et al 2015), whereas others remain restricted to small original islets (Murakami & Hayashi 2019;Yamashiro et al 2000). In addition, backcrossing and/or potential hybridization with other species is likely to have occurred to produce multiple diploid and triploid clones (Saint Girons & Ineich 1992;Buden et al 2014;Trifonov et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backcrossing has been observed as well (Saint Girons & Ineich 1992;Buden et al 2014). The paternal lineage has generally been considered undescribed in subsequent literature (e.g., Zug 2013:106), and even in the most recent literature it is still referred to as "a yet undescribed Lepidodactylus species from the South Pacific" (Griffing et al 2019) or in other similar terms (e.g., Murakami & Hayashi 2019). Zug (2013:106) provided a more detailed morphological description of the unidentified paternal species and constrained its range to a similar area as proposed by Radtkey et al (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%