2012
DOI: 10.4161/bbug.3.1.19011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2009 our group established a partnership with Serosep (an Irish molecular diagnostics company) and the Clinical Microbiology Department of Cork University Hospital (CUH), focused on the changing culture of medical microbiology in Ireland. 71 A retrospective analysis of faecal samples submitted to CUH in 2009 was performed to identify all Campylobacter species detected using Serosep's EntericBio Ò multiplex PCR system, in a single calendar year. The results confirmed that routine culture fails to detect over a third of Campylobacter positive samples.…”
Section: Bacterial Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2009 our group established a partnership with Serosep (an Irish molecular diagnostics company) and the Clinical Microbiology Department of Cork University Hospital (CUH), focused on the changing culture of medical microbiology in Ireland. 71 A retrospective analysis of faecal samples submitted to CUH in 2009 was performed to identify all Campylobacter species detected using Serosep's EntericBio Ò multiplex PCR system, in a single calendar year. The results confirmed that routine culture fails to detect over a third of Campylobacter positive samples.…”
Section: Bacterial Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, advances in molecular detection systems continue to highlight the fact that routine Campylobacter culture methods, employed by the majority of clinical laboratories, are incapable of detecting the fastidious and non-thermophilic Campylobacter spp [5]. Recent work in our laboratory has focused on the identification and characterisation of these atypical species of potential clinical importance [3,6].…”
Section: Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random nature of SCRaMbLE events can also lead to a number of sub-optimal outcomes with regards to studying rearrangements in an unbiased fashion. SCRaMbLE of haploid strains bearing one or more synthetic chromosomes results in a high lethality rate due to the deletion of one or more essential genes 3 , 6 . Additionally, deletion of important but nonessential genes may mask an otherwise apparent change of phenotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%