2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-29612016066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular detection of Anaplasma species in dogs in Colombia

Abstract: Anaplasma platys and A. phagocytophilum are tick-borne pathogens that parasitize platelets and neutrophils, respectively, of humans and animals. The former is the etiological agent of canine cyclic thrombocytopenia, while the latter is that of canine granulocytic anaplasmosis. This work involved the detection and identification of Anaplasma species in blood samples from dogs in Colombia, using molecular techniques. Between December 2008 and April 2009, blood samples were drawn from the cephalic vein of 91 dogs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological tests are only useful in the subclinical and/or chronic phase of the infection, which is unknown in this study; while the blood smear is useful in the acute phase, often asymptomatic, the low sensitivity in both natural (23) and experimental infections (24), and the low bacteraemia, make microscopic identification difficult (25) (23). Although the prevalence is low, the use of a microscopic technique that has been shown to be less sensitive, yields valuable data, taking into account that the prevalence reports in the country for commercial serological tests, Barranquilla 53.2% canine with A. platys, (15) and 40% canines with A. phagocytophilum (9), Cartagena 51% and Medellin 11% canines with A. phagocytophilum (9), could be limited to the low specificity or cross reactivity of some kits between Several species of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia (26).…”
Section: Hallazgos De Laboratoriomentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Serological tests are only useful in the subclinical and/or chronic phase of the infection, which is unknown in this study; while the blood smear is useful in the acute phase, often asymptomatic, the low sensitivity in both natural (23) and experimental infections (24), and the low bacteraemia, make microscopic identification difficult (25) (23). Although the prevalence is low, the use of a microscopic technique that has been shown to be less sensitive, yields valuable data, taking into account that the prevalence reports in the country for commercial serological tests, Barranquilla 53.2% canine with A. platys, (15) and 40% canines with A. phagocytophilum (9), Cartagena 51% and Medellin 11% canines with A. phagocytophilum (9), could be limited to the low specificity or cross reactivity of some kits between Several species of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia (26).…”
Section: Hallazgos De Laboratoriomentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Also, in dogs that presented co-infection, even when it was low, one dog developed pancytopenia, and reason why, it could not be ruled out the possibility of occurring in the other dogs, more complex hematological and clinical alterations as has been reported in other studies (14,23).…”
Section: Hallazgos De Laboratoriomentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CME is an infectious disease caused by the Ehrlichia canis bacterium, which is considered to be zoonotic (16,17) and emergent, transmitted mainly by the dog tick (Riphicephalus sanguineus) (18) phagocytophilum) en ejemplares caninos y de igual manera su detección en los vectores conocidos (19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Ehrlichia Canis and The Effects Of Doxycycline In The Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, PCR method, which has a higher specificity and sensitivity than microscopic and serological diagnosis methods, has become a reason for preference in the diagnosis of anaplasmosis in dogs. By means of this technique, the infection can be detected even in the animals having very low parasitemia and thus reservoir animals can be determined (Massung and Slater 2003;Santos et al 2011;Ebani et al 2013;Vargas-Hernandez et al 2016;Huber et al 2017). In Turkey, the number of studies on the Anaplasma species in dogs is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%