1992
DOI: 10.1016/0882-4010(92)90065-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the gene encoding the immunoreactive Brucella abortus Hsp60 protein, BA60K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5). This could be due to serological cross-reactivity between HSP65 and Brucella GroEL, since there is ϳ60% amino acid sequence homology between these two proteins (29). Similar cross-reactivity has been reported in the literature for other bacterial GroEL proteins and HSP65 (19,32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…5). This could be due to serological cross-reactivity between HSP65 and Brucella GroEL, since there is ϳ60% amino acid sequence homology between these two proteins (29). Similar cross-reactivity has been reported in the literature for other bacterial GroEL proteins and HSP65 (19,32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Our results indicated that the DnaK protein may be recognized by sera from sheep either infected by Brucella species or vaccinated with an attenuated living Brucella strain. Recently, it was reported that another member of the hsp family, the B. abortus hsp60, homologous to E. coli GroEL, was a major antigen during naturally acquired and experimentally induced brucellosis (32). These results may indicate that Brucella cells react by a stress response during their development in the host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Cloning, subcloning and the isolation of plasmid DNA were performed using standard procedures (Sambrook et al ., 1989). Genomic DNA was isolated from B. abortus cells, washed and suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), using a modification of a previously described procedure (Roop et al ., 1992). Cells were extracted with chloroform and then treated with 18 mg ml −1 lysozyme for 20 min at 37°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%