2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moho imaging based on receiver function analysis with teleseismic wavefield reconstruction: Application to South China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the shallow Moho depths beneath the Weihe Basin, Nanyang Basin, and Jianghan Basin and the deep Moho depths beneath the HNMC and SNHL domes and Dabashan Mountains are more easily recognizable (Figure 7). From the southwest to the northeast, the Moho depths beneath the Sichuan Basin increase from 40 to 50 km and then decrease to 40 km beneath the EQL and to 35 km below the Weihe Basin; these findings agree with the results from receiver function analysis (Si et al, 2016;Song et al, 2017; and ambient noise tomography (Jiang et al, 2016). P. Wang et al (2014) and Si et al (2016) discovered that the Moho beneath the Weihe Basin is much shallower than that beneath both the Ordos Basin and the QOB, whereas our results delineate a clear 2-D distribution of the Moho depth.…”
Section: Crustal Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the shallow Moho depths beneath the Weihe Basin, Nanyang Basin, and Jianghan Basin and the deep Moho depths beneath the HNMC and SNHL domes and Dabashan Mountains are more easily recognizable (Figure 7). From the southwest to the northeast, the Moho depths beneath the Sichuan Basin increase from 40 to 50 km and then decrease to 40 km beneath the EQL and to 35 km below the Weihe Basin; these findings agree with the results from receiver function analysis (Si et al, 2016;Song et al, 2017; and ambient noise tomography (Jiang et al, 2016). P. Wang et al (2014) and Si et al (2016) discovered that the Moho beneath the Weihe Basin is much shallower than that beneath both the Ordos Basin and the QOB, whereas our results delineate a clear 2-D distribution of the Moho depth.…”
Section: Crustal Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this study, we collect continuous vertical component seismic data from 71 mobile and 130 permanent China Earthquake Administration stations (Figure b). The mobile stations were deployed by the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science (Si et al, ; Song et al, ). Among them, the 35 stations marked with a yellow color in Figure b were deployed from March 2013 to April 2014, and the 36 stations marked with a green color were deployed among the previous positions from April 2014 to November 2014 (Figure b).…”
Section: Data and Ambient Noise Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of P-and S-wave receiver function imaging, suggested Moho/asthenospheric updoming beneath the MLYB, with the shallowest Moho located at 28km depth beneath the Ningwu ore field. Similar results were obtained with the H-k stacking method (Huang et al, 2015;Song et al, 2017) and the integrated inversion of surface wave and receiver function (Li H Y et al, 2018).…”
Section: Metallogenic Background For the Mlybsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In global seismology community, several methods have been proposed to interpolate the irregularly sampled seismic data. Most earlier studies have been concentrating on interpolating the receiver functions 26 that consist of P to S converted waves based on a certain form of spatial smoothing, including, for example, weighted stacking with either linear 27 , gaussian 28,29 , or cubic spline functions 30,31 . Also implemented are methods based on high-resolution Radon transform 32 , singular spectrum analysis 33,34 and, more recently, non-linear waveform stretching-and-squeezing 35 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%