2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00540-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That change in movement implicates longer lasting excitatory periods of In the present case, posterior columns as assessed by median nerve sensory evoked potentials were normal, while CSP, an inhibitory part of the flexor reflex, in the right hand was attenuated. Afferent impulses that generate the CSP are carried by A-delta fibers, which conduct nociceptive impulses on spinal interneurons, located in close proximity to the central canal [5,6,12]. These findings, together with the phenomenology of the myoclonus and its response to methadone, suggest a mechanism involving an intraspinal pathway, susceptible to nociceptive input and endorphin receptor activation.…”
Section: Sollberger P Fuhrmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…That change in movement implicates longer lasting excitatory periods of In the present case, posterior columns as assessed by median nerve sensory evoked potentials were normal, while CSP, an inhibitory part of the flexor reflex, in the right hand was attenuated. Afferent impulses that generate the CSP are carried by A-delta fibers, which conduct nociceptive impulses on spinal interneurons, located in close proximity to the central canal [5,6,12]. These findings, together with the phenomenology of the myoclonus and its response to methadone, suggest a mechanism involving an intraspinal pathway, susceptible to nociceptive input and endorphin receptor activation.…”
Section: Sollberger P Fuhrmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…18,26,27 ). Part of this discrepancy favors distinct spinal inhibitory circuitry mediated by low-and high-threshold afferents 13,18,[28][29][30] , with the possibility that dopaminergic influence is exerted only on low-threshold afferent circuitry. The latter may contribute to the electrically evoked CSP (ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter may contribute to the electrically evoked CSP (ref. 28 ) due to concomitant activation of low-threshold afferents which inevitably occurs when applying electrical stimuli to peripheral nerves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In test trials, the same stimuli were preceded by a single conditioning electrical stimulus of 0.5 ms duration delivered with ring electrodes to the 3 rd finger of the right hand at an intensity of 2 times perception threshold. For the conditioning of the MEP to TMS, we used interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 20,25,30,35,40,45, and 50 ms, which have been shown to induce significant inhi- [34,36,58]. For the conditioning of the blink reflex, we used ISIs of 90, 100, and 110 ms, which have been shown to induce significant inhibition of the orbicularis oculi response to supraorbital nerve stimuli [21,63].…”
Section: General Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features suggest an abnormal processing of sensory inputs, which could take place at various levels of the central nervous system [55]. Neurophysiological techniques can be used to assess how well a sensory input is integrated into motor circuits: somatosensory inputs induced by electrical activation of cutaneous nerves cause an inhibition of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in hand muscles [12,19,30,34,35,58,62], an effect that is believed to take place at various levels along the motor pathway, including the somatosensory cortex. Similarly, somatosensory inputs are able to suppress the reflex responses induced in the orbicularis oculi by electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve [17,21,63], an effect that is believed to take place on the trigeminal nerve afferents at the level of the brainstem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%