2014
DOI: 10.1089/brain.2013.0196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Motor Network by Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation

Abstract: The effects of transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) on resting state functional connectivity (rs-FC) within the motor network were investigated. Eleven healthy participants received one magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) session with three resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) scans, one before stimulation (PRE-STIM) to collect baseline measures, one during stimulation (STIM), and one after 13 min of stimulation (POST-STIM). Rs-FC measures during the STIM and POST-STIM conditions were compared to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are somewhat at odds with the existing literature. For example, researchers in some studies have reported increases in thalamic blood flow [ 32 ] or increased M1–thalamus connectivity after M1 stimulation [ 17 , 33 ]. We suggest that these conflicting results can be explained by the timing of stimulation and measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are somewhat at odds with the existing literature. For example, researchers in some studies have reported increases in thalamic blood flow [ 32 ] or increased M1–thalamus connectivity after M1 stimulation [ 17 , 33 ]. We suggest that these conflicting results can be explained by the timing of stimulation and measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROIs were acquired from prior studies as seeds. Together, they were used to create rs-FC maps of specific networks related to chronic pain and FM for each subject, with rs-FC being measured using the following source seeds (see Table 1 for coordinates): PAG [ 6 ], left (L) and right (R) primary and secondary somatosensory cortex (L_S1, R_S1, L_S2, R_S2) [ 25 ], left and right primary motor cortex (L_M1, R_M1) [ 26 ], left and right dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortexes (L_DLPFC, R_DPLFC, L_MPFC, R_MPFC) [ 27 , 28 ], left and right anterior and posterior insular cortexes (L_aIC, L_pIC, R_aIC, R_pIC), left and right ACC (L_ACC, R_ACC) [ 25 ], left and right ventrolateral and mediodorsal thalamus (L_VLTh, R_VLTh, L_MDTh, R_MDTh) [ 29 , 30 ], left and right hippocampus (L_Hippo, R_Hippo) [ 31 ], amygdalae (L_Amyg, R_Amyg) [ 32 ], and nucleus accumbens (L_NA, R_NA) [ 33 ]. After calculating the subjects’ FC map, the second-level comparison was performed through an ROI-to-ROI analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant fMRI studies found altered rs-FC between M1 and surrounding neural networks during a-tPCS at 15 Hz. This inter-regional correlation of signal intensities has suggested the capability of the stimulation to modulate brain regions that are functionally connected (Alon et al, 2011;Sours et al, 2014). However, a report of a-tPCs at 75 Hz on M1 has shown that they are less related to the functional connectivity behind the stimulatory effects.…”
Section: Mechanisms Based On the Dynamic Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%