2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of Baroreflex Sensitivity by Walnuts Versus Cashew Nuts in Subjects With Metabolic Syndrome

Abstract: The significant improvements in BRS obtained by a diet rich in cashew nuts underline the beneficial cardiovascular effects of nuts. However, the opposite result was obtained with a diet rich in walnuts. These significant changes observed might indicate that BRS is particularly sensitive and influenced by changes in diet without changes in obesity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BMI is reported only when no data on weight were available. †Nut dose is given based on g/day, 1 oz=28 g. ‡Energy from carbohydrate:fat:protein. §Trials with scores ≥8 were considered to be of high quality. ¶Agency funding is that from government, university or not-for-profit health agency sources. **Mean age was given separately for men and women. ††Medians were calculated from the ranges reported: Iwamoto et al 34 range 50–54 g/day; Jenkins et al 20 range 50–75 g/day; Lovejoy et al 35 range 57–113 g/day; Mukuddem-Petersen et al 40 range 63–108 g/day; Torabian et al 12 range 28–64 g/day; Zambon et al 33 range 41–56 g/day. ‡‡Companion reports: Jenkins et al 61 for Jenkins et al 15; Schutte et al 60 for Mukuddem-Petersen et al 40; West et al 62 and Holligan et al 63 for Gebauer et al 41. ¶¶Baseline characteristics were based on the number of randomised participants for Li et al 11 n=70; Ma et al 45 n=24; Zambon et al 33 n=55; Katz et al 51 n=46; Sauder et al 55 n=30; Gulati et al 58 n=68 for recruited participants for Tapsell et al 44 (n=50), and for age for Damavandi et al 54 (n=50). §§Based on 2100 kcal for Griel et al 42 and based on 1400 kcal (∼60 kg) for Gulati et al 58. ***Values for carbohydrates are reported as geometric means. AAD, Average American Diet; AHA, American Heart Association; BMI, body mass index; CHO-LCD, self-selected complex carbohydrate diet; DA, dietary advice; DM2, type 2 diabetes mellitus; HC, hypercholesterolaemic; HLP, hyperlipidaemic; M, men; Met, metabolic; MetS, metabolic syndrome; MQS, Heyland Methodological Quality Score; NA, not available; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program; NL-HC, normal to hypercholesterolaemic; NL-HLP, normal to mildly hyperlipidaemic; PD, prediabetes; OP, out-patient; OW, overweight; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SUPP, supplement; W, women. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BMI is reported only when no data on weight were available. †Nut dose is given based on g/day, 1 oz=28 g. ‡Energy from carbohydrate:fat:protein. §Trials with scores ≥8 were considered to be of high quality. ¶Agency funding is that from government, university or not-for-profit health agency sources. **Mean age was given separately for men and women. ††Medians were calculated from the ranges reported: Iwamoto et al 34 range 50–54 g/day; Jenkins et al 20 range 50–75 g/day; Lovejoy et al 35 range 57–113 g/day; Mukuddem-Petersen et al 40 range 63–108 g/day; Torabian et al 12 range 28–64 g/day; Zambon et al 33 range 41–56 g/day. ‡‡Companion reports: Jenkins et al 61 for Jenkins et al 15; Schutte et al 60 for Mukuddem-Petersen et al 40; West et al 62 and Holligan et al 63 for Gebauer et al 41. ¶¶Baseline characteristics were based on the number of randomised participants for Li et al 11 n=70; Ma et al 45 n=24; Zambon et al 33 n=55; Katz et al 51 n=46; Sauder et al 55 n=30; Gulati et al 58 n=68 for recruited participants for Tapsell et al 44 (n=50), and for age for Damavandi et al 54 (n=50). §§Based on 2100 kcal for Griel et al 42 and based on 1400 kcal (∼60 kg) for Gulati et al 58. ***Values for carbohydrates are reported as geometric means. AAD, Average American Diet; AHA, American Heart Association; BMI, body mass index; CHO-LCD, self-selected complex carbohydrate diet; DA, dietary advice; DM2, type 2 diabetes mellitus; HC, hypercholesterolaemic; HLP, hyperlipidaemic; M, men; Met, metabolic; MetS, metabolic syndrome; MQS, Heyland Methodological Quality Score; NA, not available; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program; NL-HC, normal to hypercholesterolaemic; NL-HLP, normal to mildly hyperlipidaemic; PD, prediabetes; OP, out-patient; OW, overweight; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SUPP, supplement; W, women. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… ‡‡Companion reports: Jenkins et al 61 for Jenkins et al 15; Schutte et al 60 for Mukuddem-Petersen et al 40; West et al 62 and Holligan et al 63 for Gebauer et al 41.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a dietary trial among men and women with the metabolic syndrome and an average BMI of 35, high dietary consumption of walnuts, rich in ALA and total PUFA, unexpectedly lowered the baroreflex sensitivity. (27) A depressed baroreflex sensitivity is a marker of impaired autonomic control and a risk factor for arrhythmias. (28) Further studies are needed to confirm that ALA increases the risk of SCA among overweight subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from 681 participants were analyzed in 5 clinical trials (25,34,35,37,48). Compared with control diets, nut-enriched diets had no significant effect on waist circumference (WMD: -1.25 cm; 95% CI: -2.82, 0.31 cm; I 2 = 28%) (Figure 4).…”
Section: Waist Circumferencementioning
confidence: 99%