2001
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.1000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modularity in musical processing: The automaticity of harmonic priming.

Abstract: Three experiments investigated the modularity of harmonic expectations that are based on cultural schemata despite the availability of more predictive veridical information. Participants were presented with prime-target chord pairs and made an intonation judgment about each target. Schematic expectation was manipulated by the combination of prime and target, with some transitions being schematically more probable than others. Veridical information in the form of prime-target previews, local transition probabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
65
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicates that listeners process the tonal hierarchy of the context and automatically develop tonal expectations. Automatic musical expectations have been previously shown for chord processing with the harmonic-priming paradigm Justus & Bharucha, 2001;Tillmann & Bigand, 2004;.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result indicates that listeners process the tonal hierarchy of the context and automatically develop tonal expectations. Automatic musical expectations have been previously shown for chord processing with the harmonic-priming paradigm Justus & Bharucha, 2001;Tillmann & Bigand, 2004;.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet all levels of representation are in causal play. The underlying processing of pitch and harmony goes forward inexorably and automatically (see Justus & Bharucha, 2001), maintaining patterns of activation at each of several levels of abstraction, regardless of whether or not we are aware. Attention can be focused on one level at the expense of another, or switched back and forth, yielding glimpses of recognition of structural features.…”
Section: The Conscious Recognition Of Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, they are modular in Fodor's narrow sense of being informationally encapsulated, cognitively impenetrable and automatic (Fodor, 1983(Fodor, , 2000. For example, a chord automatically generates expectations for chords that typically follow, even if the listener knows that an unexpected chord is going to follow (Justus & Bharucha, 2001). These expectations are driven automatically by a causal mapping from a representation of the context chord onto a set of activations that predict or anticipate the next chord (Bharucha & Stoeckig, 1986;Bharucha, 1987).…”
Section: Formal Eliciting Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to John theory of musical cognition, musical perception and memory depend on how the pattern and structure of music are cognitively represented in the brain. Music is typically highly regular and rigidly structured (Justus & Bharucha, 2001). By constructing, storing and recalling the use of the rules and patterns that govern music, musicians are able to build up cognitive representations of musical structure and thus process musical information more effectively than non-musicians .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%