2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1561592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular localization of massive particles with “any” spin in d=2+1

Abstract: We discuss a concept of particle localization which is motivated from quantum field theory, and has been proposed by Brunetti, Guido and Longo and by Schroer. It endows the single particle Hilbert space with a family of real subspaces indexed by the space-time regions, with certain specific properties reflecting the principles of locality and covariance. We show by construction that such a localization structure exists also in the case of massive anyons in d = 2 + 1, i.e. for particles with positive mass and w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the covering of the full Lorentz groupL ↑ + one would get a representation on Fock space of the form U (Λ) ∼ e isQΩ(Λ) U 0 (Λ) where Ω(Λ) is now an operator on the Hilbert space instead of a mere constant ω as for the group U (1) (see e.g. [22] for a possible representation ofL ↑ + on the mass shell). Another problem is that the method of considering multiplication operators on the one-particle Hilbert space as implementable Bogoliubov transformations leads to problems concerning the Hilbert-Schmidt property for theories in more than one dimension (see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the covering of the full Lorentz groupL ↑ + one would get a representation on Fock space of the form U (Λ) ∼ e isQΩ(Λ) U 0 (Λ) where Ω(Λ) is now an operator on the Hilbert space instead of a mere constant ω as for the group U (1) (see e.g. [22] for a possible representation ofL ↑ + on the mass shell). Another problem is that the method of considering multiplication operators on the one-particle Hilbert space as implementable Bogoliubov transformations leads to problems concerning the Hilbert-Schmidt property for theories in more than one dimension (see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for this fact the fields can be interpreted to be localized in "generalized cones" (or "paths of cones", see e.g. [22]) which are defined in the following way. A usual cone C in two dimensions is determined by a point x ∈ R 2 (its apex) and an interval I on the circle, specifying the asymptotic directions contained in C. Hence one can denote a cone by the pair C = ( x, I), where the width of I determining the opening angle of C should be smaller than π.…”
Section: S=1/2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the spin-statistics theorem this is not possible in higher dimensions. In d=1+2 QFT the (braid-group) statistics is determined in terms of the (anomalous) spin and this connection is already pre-empted in the setting of Wigner's classification of one-particle states [70]. The statistics in the sense of field commutation relations is also intrinsic in d=1+1 conformal theories.…”
Section: The Unfinished Business Of Gauge Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formally this corresponds to the possibility of gauge changes in (1); p(λ) changes preserve relative localization and a fortiori do not change the particle content in the presence of interactions. In contrast to the "virtual" strings of anyons/plektons [24], which, similar to cuts in complex function theory, may be displaced as long as crossings are prevented, the strings of string-local fields are "real". Needless to mention that the string-local potentials are the only vector potentials which permit a m → 0 limit.…”
Section: Formal Analogies and Conceptual Differences Between Cgi And Ssbmentioning
confidence: 99%