Modified UNIFAC (Dortmund) Parameters for the Interaction between the Amino Group at Cycloaliphatic Hydrocarbon and the Hydroxyl Group

Klauck, Mandy; Richter, Sandra; Hähnel, Thomas; Schmelzer, Jürgen; Kalies, Grit

doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03971

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 27 publications

(49 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This limits the further application of UNIFAC (Dortmund). For example, Klauck et al (2019) [25] determined the group parameters of ammonia and the interaction parameters between groups. Qin et al (2019) [26] obtained six binary interaction parameters between C 2 H 2 F, CF 4 , CF 3 , and CH 3 using the regression of experimental data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Elements and Chemical Bonds Contribution Estimation of Activity Coefficients in Nonideal Liquid Mixtures

Liu

Wang

et al. 2022

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on the contribution of elements and chemical bonds, the UNICAC (Universal Quasi-Chemical elements and chemical bonds Activity Coefficient) method was proposed to estimate the activity coefficients of nonelectrolyte liquid mixtures. The UNICAC method defined 10 elements and 33 chemical bonds as contribution groups. The calculation of activity coefficients was divided into the combination term and the residual term. The combination term represents molecular size differences, and the residual term describes the interaction between molecules. The interaction energy parameters of 43 groups were regressed simultaneously with the experimental data of the vapor–liquid equilibrium of 1085 binary systems. According to the molecular structural information of compounds, the UNICAC method can accurately predict the activity coefficients of nonelectrolyte liquid mixtures. The vapor–liquid equilibrium of 16 groups of the binary system, which were not included in the parameters regress, was predicted using UNICAC. The average relative error of vapor composition was 1.53%. Compared with UNIFAC (2003), UNIFAC (Lyngby), UNIFAC (Dortmund), and ASOG (2011), the UNICAC model employs fewer parameters, provides a broader scope of application, and receives more precise predicted results of the vapor–liquid equilibrium. The UNICAC method would play an important reference role in the design of the chemical separation process.

show abstract