2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified surgical techniques for total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: One institution's experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for patients without previous interventions and normal anatomy, "stock" prosthesis is a good alternative, eliminating costs and elaboration time 22 , according to our study in which most of the patients (25 to 56.8%) had not undergone previous surgery and obtained excellent results with the Biomet stock prosthesis [1, 8,15,17,[23][24][25] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for patients without previous interventions and normal anatomy, "stock" prosthesis is a good alternative, eliminating costs and elaboration time 22 , according to our study in which most of the patients (25 to 56.8%) had not undergone previous surgery and obtained excellent results with the Biomet stock prosthesis [1, 8,15,17,[23][24][25] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is noted that for laterality and protrusion, a bigger number of patients with a reduction of these movements was obtained, which is a common fact in postoperative condylar prosthesis installation, and that is related to the detachment of the lateral pterygoid muscles responsible for this function [2,24]. Despite involvement of pterygoid and masseter (which are disinserted) during the placement of the prosthesis, this does not interfere with its functionality, clinical and functional improvement after installing the prosthesis are obtained as well as result predictability [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the Stock prostheses is not appropriate for some patients with extensive tumors or severe deformities, intraoperative time consume to prepare the mandibular the fossa and mandibular ramus fit with the prosthesis. In contrast, the custom-made prosthesis is more expensive, but it is highly accurate, and it is also considered the prosthesis of choice in patients with major TMJ and mandibular defects [23,24].…”
Section: Stock Prosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eminence area irregularities and the fossa bottom with complex depressions result in the instability of the prostheses. Surgeons must take care when removing irregularities by a bone bur and then place the fossa component directly because they got to preserve enough bone to retain the screws on zygomatic arch [24].…”
Section: Stock Prosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some reports on the application of ankylosis6789, most of them are custom ones which are much easier to implant intraoperatively than standard ones. In order to make the bone fit the prostheses accurately, we used computer-assisted technique to guide bone trimming and implantation of the Biomet standard prostheses10111213.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%