2003
DOI: 10.1080/110241598750005138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall

Abstract: Different meshes caused specific histological reactions with changes of their mechanical properties after implantation in rodents. A new mesh with a reduced amount of polypropylene showed both less inflammation and less restriction in the mobility of the abdominal wall though it exceeded the required tensile strength of 16 N/cm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
146
1
23

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
146
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the infiltration of fibroblastic host cells that produce new ECM. After 2 months, both materials displayed increased strength (N/cm) and were within the physiologic limits required for successful abdominal wall hernia treatment [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to the infiltration of fibroblastic host cells that produce new ECM. After 2 months, both materials displayed increased strength (N/cm) and were within the physiologic limits required for successful abdominal wall hernia treatment [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For potential materials to be used in abdominal hernia repairs, the strength (N/cm) is considered the most important factor [36]. Therefore, all measurements were expressed as strength (Figure 3).…”
Section: Biomechanical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the next few years heavy weight meshes were replaced by medium to light weight meshes that reduced the bulk of the foreign material leading to less inflammation, foreign body reaction, fibrosis and the associated pain sensation [34]. Also the pore sizes were made larger (macroporous).…”
Section: Evolvement Of the Polypropylene Mesh As A Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the modern surgical mesh constructed from a knitted polypropylene has smaller pores with an area density of 90-95 g/m 2 . These heavy-weight, first generation meshes are now known to cause a vigorous foreign body reaction and resulting dense scar tissue leading to a loss of the compliance of the abdominal wall [34].…”
Section: Evolvement Of the Polypropylene Mesh As A Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low weight density (LW) prostheses were then developed ( fig.8), characterized by a lower concentration of synthetic material and larger pores (>1,000 µm). The first experimental tests were performed with a hybrid prosthesis of LW PP and polyglactine (Klinge et al, 1998), which was later sold under the name Vypro II ® (Ethicon, Johnson&Johnson, Somerville, USA). Then pure LW PP prostheses were developed and disseminated, such as Parietene ® (Tyco, Healthcare, Mansfield, MA), with a 38g/m 2 density and 1.15 +-0.05 mm 2 pores and Optilene elastic ® (Braun, Spangerwerg, Germany), with 48g/m 2 and 7.64 +-0.32mm 2 pores (Bellón, 2009).…”
Section: Fig 7 Augmentation Picture Of Polypropylene Prosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%