2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts in-hospital mortality and procedural complications in acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Additionally, AF and other cardiovascular diseases share common risk factors, which are part of the components of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score. Thus, several studies explored the predictive value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, 4,5 acute coronary syndrome 6 (ACS), valvular heart disease 7 (VHD) and thromboembolic events 8 (TE). However, the prognostic value of this score in CCU patients remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Additionally, AF and other cardiovascular diseases share common risk factors, which are part of the components of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score. Thus, several studies explored the predictive value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, 4,5 acute coronary syndrome 6 (ACS), valvular heart disease 7 (VHD) and thromboembolic events 8 (TE). However, the prognostic value of this score in CCU patients remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several definitions and scoring systems have been proposed, which seek to integrate clinical, coronary, LV, and technical aspects to predict elevated procedural risk, with varying degrees of validation, but none have been universally adopted. 13,[30][31][32][33][34] In addition to identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from MCS, determining the ideal trial population requires consideration of feasibility and generalizability. The choice of participating centers is important: recruiting centers need to have high-volume complex PCI programs, experience of pLVAD device deployment, expertise in large-bore arterial access, and a track record of recruitment to randomized clinical trials, while the use of pLVAD devices must not be so engrained that a perceived lack of equipoise prevents either the recruitment of consecutive patients or reduces the confidence of operators in safely delivering interventions without the device, which could lead to a high crossover rate.…”
Section: Methodological Challenges In Designing High-risk Pci Trials ...mentioning
confidence: 99%