2018
DOI: 10.18632/aging.101385
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Recent progress in epigenomics has led to the development of prediction systems that enable accurate age estimation from DNA methylation data. Our objective was to track responses to intense physical exercise of individual age-correlated DNA methylation markers and to infer their potential impact on the aging processes. The study showed accelerated DNA hypermethylation for two CpG sites in TRIM59 and KLF14. Both markers predicted the investigated elite athletes to be several years older than controls and this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of single-locus age prediction models based on ELOVL2 promoter methylation was also particularly interesting as DNA methylation of this age-prediction biomarker, contrary to other DNA methylation-based age-prediction biomarkers, has proven to be correlated with age in most types of tissues 45 and could thereby potentially be used on different types of samples without requiring many changes. Our model could also potentially be used to study the modification of the epigenetic clock in individuals with different health conditions, as shown in numerous studies using high-throughput multi-locus age prediction models relying on epigenotyping microarray data 12 and low-throughput multi-locus age prediction models based on pyrosequencing 17,46 . Further evaluations of our single-locus age prediction models based on ELOVL2 promoter methylation should be performed on samples from different types of tissues as well as from individuals with different health conditions and/or diseases to define the applicability of these models to such samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The development of single-locus age prediction models based on ELOVL2 promoter methylation was also particularly interesting as DNA methylation of this age-prediction biomarker, contrary to other DNA methylation-based age-prediction biomarkers, has proven to be correlated with age in most types of tissues 45 and could thereby potentially be used on different types of samples without requiring many changes. Our model could also potentially be used to study the modification of the epigenetic clock in individuals with different health conditions, as shown in numerous studies using high-throughput multi-locus age prediction models relying on epigenotyping microarray data 12 and low-throughput multi-locus age prediction models based on pyrosequencing 17,46 . Further evaluations of our single-locus age prediction models based on ELOVL2 promoter methylation should be performed on samples from different types of tissues as well as from individuals with different health conditions and/or diseases to define the applicability of these models to such samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forensics, the ability to precisely determine the chronological age of samples from DNA methylation-based age prediction models could greatly help investigators to identify and find unknown individuals 13 . In other bio-medical applications, the estimated age from DNA methylation could give an estimation of the biological age 4 and could also be an indicator of different diseases, risks and health conditions when compared to the chronological age of individuals 14 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CALB1 demonstrated robustly down-regulated expression across rhesus monkeys and humans (Loerch et al, 2008;Pabba et al, 2017). While KLF14 served as a master regulator of many genes and its altered methylation patterns were associated with the aging process (Spolnicka et al, 2018). But both of these two genes didn't demonstrate gender-specific patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…population-specific susceptibility to diseases, pharmacogenomics), but also in evolutionary studies and forensics (e.g. populations origin, relationships, identification) (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). The relation between the genome variation and population ancestry has been admittedly proven (6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%