2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifications at C(5) of 2-(2-Pyrrolidinyl)-Substituted 1,4-Benzodioxane Elicit Potent α4β2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Partial Agonism with High Selectivity over the α3β4 Subtype

Abstract: A series of diastereomeric 2-(2-pyrrolidinyl)-1,4-benzodioxanes bearing a small, hydrogen-bonding substituent at the 7-, 6-, or 5-position of benzodioxane have been studied for α4β2 and α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor affinity and activity. Analogous to C(5)H replacement with N and to a much greater extent than decoration at C(7), substitution at benzodioxane C(5) confers very high α4β2/α3β4 selectivity to the α4β2 partial agonism. Docking into the two receptor structures recently determined by cryo-elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The much higher difference in affinity between the human α3β4 and the rat α3β4 of sazetidine-A compared to that of TMAQ and AT-1001, (192-times vs. 14-and 20-times), also reflected in the 115 times higher α4β2 vs. α3β4 selectivity at the rat compared to the human subtypes, prompted us to hypothesize that other structural inter-species differences of the α3β4 subtype could be involved. Differently, the similar binding affinities at the human and rat α4β2 subtypes of sazetidine-A and of our in-house ligands, among which (S,R)-2, suggest a very high degree of inter-species binding site similarity of the α4β2 subtype [33].…”
Section: Structural Rationalization Of the Rat Vs Human Differences Of α4β2 Vs α3β4 Selectivity Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The much higher difference in affinity between the human α3β4 and the rat α3β4 of sazetidine-A compared to that of TMAQ and AT-1001, (192-times vs. 14-and 20-times), also reflected in the 115 times higher α4β2 vs. α3β4 selectivity at the rat compared to the human subtypes, prompted us to hypothesize that other structural inter-species differences of the α3β4 subtype could be involved. Differently, the similar binding affinities at the human and rat α4β2 subtypes of sazetidine-A and of our in-house ligands, among which (S,R)-2, suggest a very high degree of inter-species binding site similarity of the α4β2 subtype [33].…”
Section: Structural Rationalization Of the Rat Vs Human Differences Of α4β2 Vs α3β4 Selectivity Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…b Tested at membranes of human α3β4 transfected cells. c Data from Bavo et al [33]. d Data from Bolchi et al [32].…”
Section: Rationalization Of Determinants For α4β2 Vs α3β4 Nachr Selectivity Of Small Flexible Phenyl Ethers Of (S)-n-methyl-prolinolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations