2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1943-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of the human motor cortex by associative stimulation

Abstract: Manipulation of afferent input is capable of inducing reorganisation of the motor cortex. For example, following 1 h of paired electrical stimulation to the motor point of two hand muscles ("associative stimulation") the excitability of the corticospinal projection to the stimulated muscles is increased. Here we investigated the mechanisms responsible for such change using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Cortical excitability changes were investigated by measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs), intra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sustained increase in excitability is comparable to that induced by noninvasive stimulation of M1 such as high frequency rTMS [33], [34], theta burst stimulation [35], anodal tDCS [36], and techniques which include peripheral stimulation such as paired associative stimulation [15], [17], and synchronous sensory stimulation [37]. While repetitive motor practice in the context of skill learning can increase M1 representation area [38], [39], to our knowledge this is the first demonstration of a persistent effect on M1 excitability after repetitive movement occurring in the absence of skill learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This sustained increase in excitability is comparable to that induced by noninvasive stimulation of M1 such as high frequency rTMS [33], [34], theta burst stimulation [35], anodal tDCS [36], and techniques which include peripheral stimulation such as paired associative stimulation [15], [17], and synchronous sensory stimulation [37]. While repetitive motor practice in the context of skill learning can increase M1 representation area [38], [39], to our knowledge this is the first demonstration of a persistent effect on M1 excitability after repetitive movement occurring in the absence of skill learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In contrast, sham tSMS with PNS for 5 min failed to induce significant change in the MEP amplitude. Previous PNS studies have demonstrated that more than 10 min of repeated PNS were required to provoke consistent increases in corticospinal excitability (Ridding et al, 2000, 2001; Pyndt and Ridding, 2004; Quartarone et al, 2006). On the other hand, original study (Oliviero et al, 2011) has reported that tSMS exposure less than for 10 min failed to reduce the MEP amplitude after the end of stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed previous rENS studies have already demonstrated that more than 10 min of high‐frequency rENS are required to provoke consistent increases in corticospinal excitability. (Ridding et al 2000, 2001; Pyndt & Ridding, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%