2005
DOI: 10.1680/stco.2005.6.2.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for flexural cracking in concrete: the state of the art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Slip relates to a displacement discontinuity between the reinforcement and the surrounding concrete parallel to the reinforcement, while separation corresponds to a displacement discontinuity between the reinforcement and the surrounding concrete perpendicular (in the surface-plane) to the reinforcement. The average crack spacing and, thus, cracking-induced damage along the SCI depends on the reinforcing bar diameter, bond characteristics, concrete strength, concrete cover, the distribution of perpendicular rebars, and effective reinforcement ratio [76]. While crack widths of primary, internal, and secondary cracks range between lm and mm, the extent of these cracks can be up to several meters.…”
Section: Cracks Slip and Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slip relates to a displacement discontinuity between the reinforcement and the surrounding concrete parallel to the reinforcement, while separation corresponds to a displacement discontinuity between the reinforcement and the surrounding concrete perpendicular (in the surface-plane) to the reinforcement. The average crack spacing and, thus, cracking-induced damage along the SCI depends on the reinforcing bar diameter, bond characteristics, concrete strength, concrete cover, the distribution of perpendicular rebars, and effective reinforcement ratio [76]. While crack widths of primary, internal, and secondary cracks range between lm and mm, the extent of these cracks can be up to several meters.…”
Section: Cracks Slip and Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the evaluation of w and s r in RC and R/FRC beams under bending and compression still remains an open problem. Despite the huge amount of investigations on RC structures in more than a century (see (Borosnyoi and Balazs) [3] for a review), the existing formulae for evaluating crack width and crack spacing are not unanimously accepted. As a matter of fact, while the American Concrete Institute [4] suggests an empirical approach for the evaluation of w (derived from the tests by (Gergely and Lutz) [5], which is independent of crack distance, both CEB-FIP Model Code 90 [6] and (Eurocode 2) [7] recommend the following semi-empirical formula:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eqs. (1)(2)(3) are not always effective for the prediction of real crack patters in RC and R/FRC members subjected to bending moment and normal forces. It is sufficient to recall that crack width is arbitrarily assumed to be in direct proportion with a unique value of crack distance, generally measured at stabilized crack pattern by Eqs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the previous work on crack width and spacing formulations in RC members are presented in Borosnyoi and Balazs [29]. In general, these equations have the following format [30]:…”
Section: Code Provisions For Crack Spacing and Crack Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%