2014
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models and visions of science-policy interaction: Remarks from a Delphi study in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Delphi method is a systematic approach to reaching consensus through interactive communication among experts [47]. The Delphi methodology is often used in PA policy research [4850], as well as within the field of PA research in general [51]. Various tools may be employed to administer a Delphi process [52, 53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delphi method is a systematic approach to reaching consensus through interactive communication among experts [47]. The Delphi methodology is often used in PA policy research [4850], as well as within the field of PA research in general [51]. Various tools may be employed to administer a Delphi process [52, 53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finalidade da Policy Delphi é averiguar o consenso entre especialistas sobre as políticas que possam colaborar com o tema em análise (Critcher & Gladstone, 1998). Sua operacionalização envolve a proposição de políticas por especialistas seguida de suas análises das dimensões importância e exequibilidade pelo grupo de especialistas (Valente, Castellani, Larsen & Aro, 2015).…”
Section: Quadro 1 Tecnologias Em Apoio àS Funções Críticas Da Abordaunclassified
“…In our case, it was a policymaker who played the role of knowledge broker. Valente et al (2014) have pointed out that the quality of scientific advice depends on the clarity and quality of the knowledge user in being able to identify and communicate what his needs and requirements are. So, the demand side is considered to have the main responsibility for the quality of the advice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mode 1, science and policy are seen as separate domains, with science perceived as a uniquely neutral provider of objective knowledge (Van den Hove 2007;Wardekker et al 2008), and decision-making perceived as the domain and responsibility of policy specialists (Demeritt 2006in Young et al 2014). Thus, when policymakers consider scientific facts to be true, objective, and independent, they can basically rely on them for the development of policies without the fear of political backlash (Valente et al 2014). Considering science and policy as separated is convenient to policymakers as it gives them room to shift blame and avoid political responsibility (Gieryn 1983;Flinders and Buller 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation