2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling users’ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
64
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have also reported that the government could play an important role in fostering carsharing market development, primarily in the form of providing financial support and subsidized parking [49,50,51]. For example, some 80% of carsharing organizations in the USA are financial supported by governments through tax incentives, starting investments, emergency risk fund support, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have also reported that the government could play an important role in fostering carsharing market development, primarily in the form of providing financial support and subsidized parking [49,50,51]. For example, some 80% of carsharing organizations in the USA are financial supported by governments through tax incentives, starting investments, emergency risk fund support, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the implementation of more efficient approaches to Monte Carlo simulation-based algorithms for SNL-Probit. From an operational viewpoint, it would be interesting to embed, within the assignment procedure, travel demand management strategies or supply-oriented policies [58,59], signal setting design problems [17,18] and/or the effects of Advanced Traveller Information Systems [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies illustrate that demographic factors, for example, age, influence the utilization of carsharing services (e.g., de Luca & Di Pace, ; Jian, Rashidi, & Dixit, ; Prieto, Baltas, & Stan, ). Furthermore, consumer psychographic variables and motivations have been identified as important factors for the use of access‐based and sharing programs in general (e.g., Benoit, Baker, Bolton, Gruber, & Kandampully, ; Lamberton, ; Moeller & Wittkowski, ; Roos & Hahn, ) as well as carsharing in particular (Peterson & Simkins, ; Schaefers, ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from individual user aspects, program characteristics of carsharing business models also influence adoption. In this regard, costs are an obvious factor to the decision to own or share a car (Schuster, Byrne, Corbett, & Schreuder, ; also de Luca & Di Pace, ) and has shown to be crucial for the success or failure (Perboli et al ()). With regard to the overarching setup of different carsharing options, Münzel et al () posit that no specific provider model (cooperative, business‐to‐consumer, and peer‐to‐peer) will dominate in the foreseeable future and Cohen and Kietzmann () add, with a focus on the provider of carsharing services, that both private and public models are fraught with principal–agent conflicts.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%