2006
DOI: 10.1080/17474230601058310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling urbanization patterns in two diverse regions of the world

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameterization of this application of the LTM follows procedures used in Pijanowski et al (2005Pijanowski et al ( , 2006. The following rules/assumptions were made for the forecasts:…”
Section: The Land Transformation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameterization of this application of the LTM follows procedures used in Pijanowski et al (2005Pijanowski et al ( , 2006. The following rules/assumptions were made for the forecasts:…”
Section: The Land Transformation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a Kappa value between 0.01 and 0.20 indicates slight agreement, and PCM results from 40% to 60% are interpreted as acceptable models [23,25,71,75]. Thus, while the Kappa value indicates that agreement would be too poor to accept, if this was an actual model, this example model might be acceptable when considering the PCM.…”
Section: Accuracy and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are driven by the logic of the modeler and consist of the variables built into the model, which drive the connecting neurons. These connections work out solutions between inputs (i.e., drivers of change) and outputs (e.g., locations of change occurring between two time periods) using non-linear functions and weights [71].…”
Section: Accuracy and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing rules to assess land cover dynamics, there is the temptation to over-parameterize the model and hence 'over fit', rendering the model deterministic (e.g. Brown et al 2005;Pijanowski, Alexandridis and Mueller 2006). Calibration of the model is commonly accomplished by comparing the model outcomes to a series of classified satellite images, and fine-tuning the parameter values, rules and relationships to generate improved model fit.…”
Section: Representing Uncertainty: Model Calibration and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%