2014
DOI: 10.1179/1754762814y.0000000081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the effects of cochlear implant current focusing

Abstract: Although such focusing strategies cannot be achieved in practice at the moment, since the responses from the electrodes to the neural sites cannot be determined with currently available recording methods, these results do support the feasibility of a more effective focusing strategy, which may provide improved spectral resolution leading to improved perception of sound.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In applied research, the effect of new technological innovations is being investigated, such as the use of current focusing and beam steering to improve frequency resolution in CIs. In this case, the potential distribution in a specific cochlea, due to multiple current sources, has to be determined and its effectivity to increase spatial, and thus frequency resolution needs to be evaluated. User‐specific implementation of cochlear morphology in a model could, for example, inform the design criteria for beam‐steering electrode arrays that need to function over a morphologically diverse implant population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applied research, the effect of new technological innovations is being investigated, such as the use of current focusing and beam steering to improve frequency resolution in CIs. In this case, the potential distribution in a specific cochlea, due to multiple current sources, has to be determined and its effectivity to increase spatial, and thus frequency resolution needs to be evaluated. User‐specific implementation of cochlear morphology in a model could, for example, inform the design criteria for beam‐steering electrode arrays that need to function over a morphologically diverse implant population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical responses, such as the BM response, OW and round window (RW) volume velocity, and cochlear fluid pressure, can evaluate the inner ear performance. In addition to studying the mechanical response of the cochlea, some researchers have established volume conduction models to explore the electrical response of the cochlea (31,(47)(48)(49)(50). The volume conduction model differs from the mechanical model as it uses electrical characteristics, such as resistivity, to simulate each part of the ear (51).…”
Section: Inner Ear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element computational modeling of electrical stimulation in the cochlea has been the subject of many investigations for over 30 years (Finley et al, 1987; Finley, 1989; Finley et al, 1990). More recent models based on image reconstructions (Ceresa et al, 2014; Kalkman et al, 2015; Kang et al, 2015; Malherbe et al, 2016; Tachos et al, 2016; Teal and Ni, 2016; Wong et al, 2016; Cakir et al, 2017; Schafer et al, 2018) or simplified geometries (Briaire and Frijns, 2000, 2006; Hanekom, 2001; Rattay et al, 2001; Goldwyn et al, 2010; Saba et al, 2014; Nogueira et al, 2016) of the cochlea have been applied to predict electric potential and field distributions following electric stimulation by electrode arrays of cochlear implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%