2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the dynamic failure of brittle rocks using a hybrid continuum-discrete element method with a mixed-mode cohesive fracture model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molaro et al () carried out fully three‐dimensional finite element calculations of macroscopic thermal stress development in various sized rocks on the Moon ( δ ∼0.8 m), and reported values of the maximum surface principal stresses of ∼2 MPa, ∼5 MPa, and ∼9 MPa for D =0.3 m, D =0.5 m, and D =0.7 m. Remarkably, these stress values are fairly consistent with predictions (respectively ∼1.5 MPa, ∼4 MPa, and ∼8 MPa for the same set of material properties) of Equation despite its simplicity and lack of fitting parameters. These stress values are generally smaller than fracture toughness of typical rocks (Asadi, Taeibi‐Rahni, Akbarzadeh, Javadi, & Ahmadi, ; El Mir, Ramesh, & Delbo, ; Eppes & Keanini, ; Gui, Bui, Kodikara, Zhang, & Zhao, ) and would lead to slow steady fatigue process.…”
Section: Effect Of Diurnal Temperature Variations and Gradients On Thmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Molaro et al () carried out fully three‐dimensional finite element calculations of macroscopic thermal stress development in various sized rocks on the Moon ( δ ∼0.8 m), and reported values of the maximum surface principal stresses of ∼2 MPa, ∼5 MPa, and ∼9 MPa for D =0.3 m, D =0.5 m, and D =0.7 m. Remarkably, these stress values are fairly consistent with predictions (respectively ∼1.5 MPa, ∼4 MPa, and ∼8 MPa for the same set of material properties) of Equation despite its simplicity and lack of fitting parameters. These stress values are generally smaller than fracture toughness of typical rocks (Asadi, Taeibi‐Rahni, Akbarzadeh, Javadi, & Ahmadi, ; El Mir, Ramesh, & Delbo, ; Eppes & Keanini, ; Gui, Bui, Kodikara, Zhang, & Zhao, ) and would lead to slow steady fatigue process.…”
Section: Effect Of Diurnal Temperature Variations and Gradients On Thmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Doan et al established a numerical simulation developed based on phase field theory, to consider a mode I crack problem. Gui et al used the hybrid continuum‐discrete element method for simulating the fracturing process in rock dynamic tests based on notched semicircular bending and Brazilian disc tests. Using an eigensoftening mesh‐free approach, a three‐point bending test of concrete with a drop‐weight device was used to simulate the gradual process of failure in the brittle materials .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides this, numerical simulation also plays an important role in crack coalescence research [1,22,[31][32][33]. One of the popular tools nowadays is the discrete element method [18,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%