1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-50124-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Social Animal Aggregations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lagrangian approach treats each organism as a particle obeying a nonlinear difference or differential equation (Sakai, 1973;Suzuki and Sakai, 1973;Okubo et al, 1977;Vicsek et al, 1995;Levine et al, 2001;Schweitzer et al, 2001;Couzin et al, 2002;Erdmann et al, 2002;Parrish et al, 2003;Aldana and Huepe, 2003;Erdmann and Ebeling, 2003;Mogilner et al, 2003). Alternatively, the Eulerian approach describes the local flux of individuals with an advectiondiffusion equation for a continuum population density field (Kawasaki, 1978;Okubo, 1980;Mimura and Yamaguti, 1982;Passo and Demottoni, 1984;Ikeda, 1984;Alt, 1985;Ikeda, 1985;Satsuma and Mimura, 1985;Ikeda and Nagai, 1987;Hosono and Mimura, 1989;Grünbaum and Okubo, 1994;Edelstein-Keshet et al, 1998;Toner and Tu, 1998;Flierl et al, 1999;Mogilner and Edelstein-Keshet, 1999;Topaz and Bertozzi, 2004). A variety of methods can be used to connect the two formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Lagrangian approach treats each organism as a particle obeying a nonlinear difference or differential equation (Sakai, 1973;Suzuki and Sakai, 1973;Okubo et al, 1977;Vicsek et al, 1995;Levine et al, 2001;Schweitzer et al, 2001;Couzin et al, 2002;Erdmann et al, 2002;Parrish et al, 2003;Aldana and Huepe, 2003;Erdmann and Ebeling, 2003;Mogilner et al, 2003). Alternatively, the Eulerian approach describes the local flux of individuals with an advectiondiffusion equation for a continuum population density field (Kawasaki, 1978;Okubo, 1980;Mimura and Yamaguti, 1982;Passo and Demottoni, 1984;Ikeda, 1984;Alt, 1985;Ikeda, 1985;Satsuma and Mimura, 1985;Ikeda and Nagai, 1987;Hosono and Mimura, 1989;Grünbaum and Okubo, 1994;Edelstein-Keshet et al, 1998;Toner and Tu, 1998;Flierl et al, 1999;Mogilner and Edelstein-Keshet, 1999;Topaz and Bertozzi, 2004). A variety of methods can be used to connect the two formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual method involves a Fokker-Planck approximation which relates the distribution of jump distances made by individuals to terms in the advection-diffusion equation (Okubo and Levin, 2001). Since the social communications between organisms often take place at large distances via sight, sound, or smell, models may be nonlocal in space (Kawasaki, 1978;Alt, 1985;Ikeda, 1985;Satsuma and Mimura, 1985;Ikeda and Nagai, 1987;Hosono and Mimura, 1989;Grünbaum and Okubo, 1994;Flierl et al, 1999;Mogilner and Edelstein-Keshet, 1999;Okubo et al, 2001;Topaz and Bertozzi, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting example in this line is non-local aggregation [21][22][23], e.g. appearing in animal swarms looking for a density, but also in macroscopic models of consensus formation.…”
Section: Spatial Pattern Formation By Consensus and Herdingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spatial approach the space (environment) is either explicitly or implicitly present in the model and the analysis. It can be divided into two distinct frameworks which are individual-based (or Lagrangian) framework and continuum (or Eulerian) framework [6]. In the individual-based models the basic description is the motion equation of each (separate) individual and therefore it is a natural approach for modeling and analysis of complex social interactions and aggregations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%