2014
DOI: 10.1680/geng.13.00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling helical screw piles in soft clay and design implications

Abstract: Helical screw piles are a popular solution for relatively low-capacity, removable or recyclable foundations supporting road and rail signage or similar light structures. When specifying a helical screw pile, a designer must choose the active length and the helical plate spacing ratio, which are governed by the number, spacing and size of the individual helices. This paper presents an investigation using transparent synthetic soil and particle image velocimetry to observe the failure of helical screw piles with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early experiments in transparent soil adopted back illumination to silhouette embedded target markers to capture the mechanical response of the soil (Gill and Lehane 2001); however, this has been superseded by laser-aided imaging in conjunction with DIC to illuminate soil texture ( Fig. 1) for increased measurement density and resolution Stanier et al 2013). A summary of the development of transparent soil and recent works is reported by Iskander (2010).…”
Section: Visualisation In Geotechnical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early experiments in transparent soil adopted back illumination to silhouette embedded target markers to capture the mechanical response of the soil (Gill and Lehane 2001); however, this has been superseded by laser-aided imaging in conjunction with DIC to illuminate soil texture ( Fig. 1) for increased measurement density and resolution Stanier et al 2013). A summary of the development of transparent soil and recent works is reported by Iskander (2010).…”
Section: Visualisation In Geotechnical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both the latter works, the model geometry reported was considerably larger than any previously achieved using precipitated amorphous silica; for example, McKelvey (2002) tests were conducted in a 415 mm diameter chamber, suggesting that fumed silica soils offered superior optical quality than precipitated amorphous silica counterparts. Recent works using a variant of this fumed silica material coupled with DIC laser aided measurement include examination of helical screw piles (Stanier 2011;Stanier et al 2013), stone column ground improvement (Kelly 2013), soil plugging behavior during press-in piling of tubular piles (Black 2012a;Forlati and Black 2014), sample disturbance effects (Black 2012b). …”
Section: Fine Grained Transparent Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Recent works using this approach relate to model piles (Iskander et al 2002a), shallow foundations (Liu et al 2002;Iskander and Lui 2010), tunnel induced settlements (Ahmed and Iskander 2010), helical screw piles (Stanier et al 2013), stone column group behavior (Kelly 2013), soil plugging in tubular piles (Black 2012a;Forlati and Black 2014), and sample disturbance effects during tube sample recovery (Black 2012b).…”
Section: Transparent Soil Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gill (1999) used back illumination to silhouette embedded target markers; however, that has been superseded by modern laser aided imaging in conjunction with digital image correlation techniques (for example Sadek et al 2003 andHird et al 2008). Works using this approach include examination of failure mechanics of helical screw piles (Stanier et al 2013), stone column groups (Kelly 2013), and tunnel induced settlements (Ahmed and Iskander 2010) soil plugging behavior during press-in piling of tubular piles (Black 2012;Forlati and Black 2014). The success of transparent soil modeling has long been considered reliant on producing a soil surrogate that offers the highest optical clarity, with low transparency being considered detrimental to the modeling technique (Black and Take 2015).…”
Section: Transparent Soil Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%