2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelled spatiotemporal variability of outdoor thermal comfort in local climate zones of the city of Brno, Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using HUMIDEX to quantify outdoor human thermal comfort, Geletič et al . () concluded that the most thermally uncomfortable areas within Brno (Czech Republic) were all built LCZs, apart from LCZ 4 and LCZ 9, which probably benefited from shading associated with high‐rise buildings and a high proportion of vegetated areas. With reference to all the above studies, one may conclude that LCZ 5 is the area that is most prone to heat stress, while LCZ A and LCZ 9 are thermally more pleasant zones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using HUMIDEX to quantify outdoor human thermal comfort, Geletič et al . () concluded that the most thermally uncomfortable areas within Brno (Czech Republic) were all built LCZs, apart from LCZ 4 and LCZ 9, which probably benefited from shading associated with high‐rise buildings and a high proportion of vegetated areas. With reference to all the above studies, one may conclude that LCZ 5 is the area that is most prone to heat stress, while LCZ A and LCZ 9 are thermally more pleasant zones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from studies on the air temperature differences between LCZs, attempts have been made to evaluate outdoor thermal comfort conditions for different LCZs using physiological equivalent temperatures (PET) calculated from station measurements (Kovács and Németh, ; Van Hove et al, ; Milošević et al, ; Unger et al, ) and thermal sensation votes obtained from field surveys (Villadiego and Velay‐Dabat, ). Other studies (Müller et al, ; Geletič et al, ) have examined the spatiotemporal variability of outdoor human thermal comfort with respect to LCZs and relevant adaptation scenarios to reduce heat stress with the help of numerical model simulations. Understanding both the temporal and spatial distribution of thermal comfort indicators in cities could provide urban planners with helpful information for climate‐responsive planning and the formulation of city‐wide heat stress mitigation strategies (Koppe et al, ; Kleerekoper et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extreme heat conditions occur when Humidex exceeds specific thresholds (Humidex > 30). Its results are directly comparable with temperature in degrees Celsius and its values are associated with the corresponding degrees of thermal comfort, rendering the index "widely understandable" as Geletič et al (2018) point out. This index is particularly suitable for the assessment of bioclimatic conditions in a certain area during the hot part of the year, late spring and especially the summer months.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It also uses categorisations of proportions of surfaces of varied kinds using an established scale: built-up, impermeable, and permeable surface parts such as vegetation cover and soil (Sievers et al, 1983). The model has been used for UHI studies in various cities, for example, Vienna (Žuvela et al, 2014), Brno (Geletič et al, 2016(Geletič et al, , 2018, Bratislava (Holec and Šťastný, 2017), Szeged (Gál and Skarbit, 2017) or comparison of five central European cities (Bokwa et al, 2015;Bokwa et al, in print). Several model inputs are necessary, including layers of a digital elevation model, a LC/LU map, parameters of LC/LU classes, and meteorological inputs.…”
Section: Model Muklimomentioning
confidence: 99%