1989
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Modélisations des isothermes d'adsorption sur charbon actif de composés aromatiques en solution aqueuse
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
11
5
3
0
Citation Types
1
10
0
0
Year Published
Range
1991
19912026
2026Publication Types
Select...
15
1
Relationship
1
15
Authors
Journals
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
References 15 publications
1
10
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, for high initial concentrations, the increase in the ionic strength of the solution induces a small decrease in modeling performance. This confirms a previous study, which demonstrated that the performance of the IAS model was lower for high concentrations …”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, for high initial concentrations, the increase in the ionic strength of the solution induces a small decrease in modeling performance. This confirms a previous study, which demonstrated that the performance of the IAS model was lower for high concentrations …”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…As depicted in Figure 7 , CPOSs‐NXU‐1 showed excellent adsorption capacity for As III ions. The maximum adsorption capacity ( Q m ) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for As III ions was calculated by fitting the Langmuir‐Freundlich‐type Baudu model [ 26 ] (Equation S3 and Table S2 , Supporting Information), resulting in a value of 748.99±144.99 mg g −1 (based on As) at 273 K, which is significantly higher than that of any other known trivalent arsenic adsorption materials to date ( Table 1 ). Although the adsorption of As III ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 decreases with increasing temperature, Q m is still 451.01±37.18 mg g −1 at 303 K. Furthermore, SEM‐EDS mapping showed the homogeneous distribution of arsenic on CPOSs‐NXU‐1 after adsorption of As III ions (Figure 7 ) corroborated the effective performance of the material in adsorbing As III ions.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5) were investigated to fit the experimental data of ZnMgFe LDH as an adsorbent. The models used were Langmuir, 46 Freundlich, 47 Temkin, Dubinin–Radushkevich (D–R), 48 Langmuir–Freundlich, Sips, 49 Redlich–Peterson, 50,51 Toth, 52 Fritz–Schlunder, and Baudu 53 isotherms. The results show that the Dubinin–Radushkevich model is the most adequate with the highest R 2 value of 0.98 as illustrated in Table 2.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, for high initial concentrations, the increase in the ionic strength of the solution induces a small decrease in modeling performance. This confirms a previous study, which demonstrated that the performance of the IAS model was lower for high concentrations …”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…As depicted in Figure 7 , CPOSs‐NXU‐1 showed excellent adsorption capacity for As III ions. The maximum adsorption capacity ( Q m ) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for As III ions was calculated by fitting the Langmuir‐Freundlich‐type Baudu model [ 26 ] (Equation S3 and Table S2 , Supporting Information), resulting in a value of 748.99±144.99 mg g −1 (based on As) at 273 K, which is significantly higher than that of any other known trivalent arsenic adsorption materials to date ( Table 1 ). Although the adsorption of As III ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 decreases with increasing temperature, Q m is still 451.01±37.18 mg g −1 at 303 K. Furthermore, SEM‐EDS mapping showed the homogeneous distribution of arsenic on CPOSs‐NXU‐1 after adsorption of As III ions (Figure 7 ) corroborated the effective performance of the material in adsorbing As III ions.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5) were investigated to fit the experimental data of ZnMgFe LDH as an adsorbent. The models used were Langmuir, 46 Freundlich, 47 Temkin, Dubinin–Radushkevich (D–R), 48 Langmuir–Freundlich, Sips, 49 Redlich–Peterson, 50,51 Toth, 52 Fritz–Schlunder, and Baudu 53 isotherms. The results show that the Dubinin–Radushkevich model is the most adequate with the highest R 2 value of 0.98 as illustrated in Table 2.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, for high initial concentrations, the increase in the ionic strength of the solution induces a small decrease in modeling performance. This confirms a previous study, which demonstrated that the performance of the IAS model was lower for high concentrations …”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…As depicted in Figure 7 , CPOSs‐NXU‐1 showed excellent adsorption capacity for As III ions. The maximum adsorption capacity ( Q m ) of CPOSs‐NXU‐1 for As III ions was calculated by fitting the Langmuir‐Freundlich‐type Baudu model [ 26 ] (Equation S3 and Table S2 , Supporting Information), resulting in a value of 748.99±144.99 mg g −1 (based on As) at 273 K, which is significantly higher than that of any other known trivalent arsenic adsorption materials to date ( Table 1 ). Although the adsorption of As III ions by CPOSs‐NXU‐1 decreases with increasing temperature, Q m is still 451.01±37.18 mg g −1 at 303 K. Furthermore, SEM‐EDS mapping showed the homogeneous distribution of arsenic on CPOSs‐NXU‐1 after adsorption of As III ions (Figure 7 ) corroborated the effective performance of the material in adsorbing As III ions.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5) were investigated to fit the experimental data of ZnMgFe LDH as an adsorbent. The models used were Langmuir, 46 Freundlich, 47 Temkin, Dubinin–Radushkevich (D–R), 48 Langmuir–Freundlich, Sips, 49 Redlich–Peterson, 50,51 Toth, 52 Fritz–Schlunder, and Baudu 53 isotherms. The results show that the Dubinin–Radushkevich model is the most adequate with the highest R 2 value of 0.98 as illustrated in Table 2.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%