2022
DOI: 10.1111/mbe.12336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Contribution of Genetic Variation to Cognitive Gains Following Training with a Machine Learning Approach

Abstract: The objective of this research was to develop robust predictive models of the gains in working memory (WM) and fluid intelligence (Gf ) following executive attention training in children, using genetic markers, gender, and age variables. We explore the influence of genetic variables on individual differences in susceptibility to intervention. Sixty-six children (males: 54.2%) aged 50.9-75.9 months participated in a four-weeks computerized training program. Information on genes involved in the regulation of dop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(117 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ANN methodology has the advantage of capturing complex and nonlinear relationships among these early variables which seem to be indicators of a lower level of self-regulated behavior at a later age, even when there were no significant differences in individual predictors between the children at risk and moderate/high EC. The evaluation measures of the ANN in this study are consistent with previous research indicating their robustness for modeling complex patterns among variables associated with self-regulation and educational outcomes [ 65 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ANN methodology has the advantage of capturing complex and nonlinear relationships among these early variables which seem to be indicators of a lower level of self-regulated behavior at a later age, even when there were no significant differences in individual predictors between the children at risk and moderate/high EC. The evaluation measures of the ANN in this study are consistent with previous research indicating their robustness for modeling complex patterns among variables associated with self-regulation and educational outcomes [ 65 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the SES-executive functions relationship varies between low to medium in size depending on several moderators such as the SES variability in the sample, number, and methods used to measure EF, but it remains stable across childhood [ 103 ]. Although the sample in this study has a modest SES variability, the pattern of interaction effects between these early SES factors in the environment with cognitive markers of attentional functions resulted in a plausible model in the ANN analyses [ 91 , 104 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANN methodology has the advantage of capturing complex and nonlinear relationships among these early variables which seem to be indicators of a lower level of self-regulated behavior at a later age, even when there were no significant differences in individual predictors between the children at risk and the rest of the subjects. The evaluation measures of the ANN in this study are consistent with previous research indicating their robustness for modeling complex patterns among variables associated with self-regulation and educational outcomes [60,[83][84][85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the SESexecutive functions relationship varies between low to medium in size depending on several moderators such as the SES variability in the sample, number and methods used to measure EF, but it remains stable across childhood [100]. Although the sample in this study has a modest SES variability, the pattern of interaction effects between these early SES factors in the environment with cognitive markers of attentional functions resulted in a plausible model in the ANN analyses [88,101].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%