2015
DOI: 10.5194/acpd-15-22781-2015
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling study of the 2010 regional haze event in the North China Plain

Abstract: Abstract. The online coupled Weather Research and Forecasting-Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model was applied to simulate a haze event that happened in January 2010 in the North China Plain (NCP), and was validated against various types of measurements. The evaluations indicate that WRF-Chem provides reliable simulations for the 2010 haze event in the NCP. This haze event is mainly caused by high emissions of air pollutants in the NCP and stable weather conditions in winter. Secondary inorganic aerosols also played an … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the observed RH2 are also high at the four sites, with observation mean (C OBS ) � 70.51 to 90.16%. e high RH2 may be conducive to secondary growth of air pollutants [23][24][25]. e observed T2 at the four sites are also reasonably reproduced by the model (rootmean-square error (RMSE) � 2.02 to 4.44 and normalized mean error (NME) � 0.01 to 0.03).…”
Section: Surface Pressure Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, the observed RH2 are also high at the four sites, with observation mean (C OBS ) � 70.51 to 90.16%. e high RH2 may be conducive to secondary growth of air pollutants [23][24][25]. e observed T2 at the four sites are also reasonably reproduced by the model (rootmean-square error (RMSE) � 2.02 to 4.44 and normalized mean error (NME) � 0.01 to 0.03).…”
Section: Surface Pressure Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, the magnitudes and trends over time of the simulated PM 2.5 , NO 2 , and SO 2 are basically consistent with measurements ( Figure 4). From meteorological variables, and undiscovered processes of atmospheric chemistry [24]. Overall, however, the simulated results generally captured the heavy air pollution event that provides some reliability for the later sensitive experiments.…”
Section: Surface Pressure Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations