2017 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society General Meeting 2017
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2017.8274307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling power system buses using performance based earthquake engineering methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling the peak amount of load lost is challenging as that at minimum requires the modeling of protection equipment or relaying at some level-either by using a nodebreaker version of the system case-file or by augmenting the traditional bus-branch version of case-file to model protection equipment [55,56]-and potentially the dynamic behavior of both load and generation [57,58]. These challenges also arise in cascading failure modeling and are described in relevant literature [57,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Operation-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling the peak amount of load lost is challenging as that at minimum requires the modeling of protection equipment or relaying at some level-either by using a nodebreaker version of the system case-file or by augmenting the traditional bus-branch version of case-file to model protection equipment [55,56]-and potentially the dynamic behavior of both load and generation [57,58]. These challenges also arise in cascading failure modeling and are described in relevant literature [57,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Operation-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Unsupplied load [4,37,53,54,72,[75][76][77][78][79], which was also used in weighted [80][81][82], expected [21,83,84],…”
Section: Power Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) Production and load mismatch (either production greater than load or vice versa) in the worst scenario [9,99,100]. (8) Generation capacity not connected [4,71,72,79]. (9) Generation capacity connected [4,72].…”
Section: Power Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessity of the first 3 steps and use of the Performance Based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE) method is discussed in the [6][7][8]. Although this study focuses on the Portland Hills Fault case study using the Western Electrical Coordinating Council (WECC) model as the power grid model, it also intends to propose the overall framework used for this case study as a larger framework to connect risk and resilience of any power system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%