2006
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2005.864343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling packet-loss visibility in MPEG-2 video

Abstract: We consider the problem of predicting packet loss visibility in MPEG-2 video. We use two modeling approaches: CART and GLM. The former classifies each packet loss as visible or not; the latter predicts the probability that a packet loss is visible. For each modeling approach, we develop three methods, which differ in the amount of information available to them. A reduced reference method has access to limited information based on the video at the encoder's side and has access to the video at the decoder's side… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The location of the packet is of significant importance, because different types of frames carry information of different nature. A similar approach for MPEG2 video is presented in [15]. This method uses different machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the visibility of the lost packet on the presented video.…”
Section: Reduced and No Reference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of the packet is of significant importance, because different types of frames carry information of different nature. A similar approach for MPEG2 video is presented in [15]. This method uses different machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the visibility of the lost packet on the presented video.…”
Section: Reduced and No Reference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent piece of work presented mathematical foundations and quality predictors for decoders to conceal losses by copying or freezing [19]. Other recent work aims at predicting the visibility of a packet loss to the HVS [20]- [22], where the important issue of accurately evaluating the impact of packet loss on the quality of each frame has not been fully addressed. In [23], an FR metric for evaluating the quality degradation due to packet loss was presented utilizing the "PSNR drops" of erroneous frames.…”
Section: Impact Of Packet Loss On Perceivedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the proposed approach does not require availability of the video sequence at the receiving end, no general network performance metric that can be directly mapped to the perceived quality was identified. In a number of studies [53,93,52] the authors considered the effect of errors visibility in various video sequences. Particularly, in [53,52] they introduced artificial losses to the received stream of packets and tried to detect whether they are visible to a viewer.…”
Section: Network-related Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%