2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling functional resting-state brain networks through neural message passing on the human connectome

Abstract: Understanding the relationship between the structure and function of the human brain is one of the most important open questions in Neurosciences. In particular, Resting State Networks (RSN) and more specifically the Default Mode Network (DMN) of the brain, which are defined from the analysis of functional data lack a definitive justification consistent with the anatomical structure of the brain. In this work we show that a possible connection may naturally rest on the idea that information flows in the brain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S12 ). Clustering similarity was determined using the normalized mutual information (NMI) (Peraza et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S12 ). Clustering similarity was determined using the normalized mutual information (NMI) (Peraza et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Parr et al discuss neuronal message passing [39], with a good review of relevant literature. Recent work on neural connectivity in the brain by Peraza-Goicolea et al (2020) addresses susceptibility propagation (SP), belief propagation (BP), and critical state dynamics [40], and Friston, Parr, and de Vries (2017) investigate the connection between belief propagation and active inference [16]. Thus, the substantial work on message passing in neural systems may usefully inform further investigations on using a 2-D CVM as a means for modeling neural systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work in modeling neurological diseases have primarily explored computational models of cellular processes focusing on pathological changes such as excitotoxicity or abnormal bioenergetics (Le Masson et al, 2014;Muddapu et al, 2019), or connectome models based on structural or functional connectivity in the brain (Hof et al, 1997;Raj et al, 2012;Zhou et al, 2012;Ortiz et al, 2015;Peraza-Goicolea et al, 2020;Vanasse et al, 2021). Early work investigating structural or functional connectomes primarily focused on modeling specific aspects of disease progression, such as diffusive spread of misfolded tau and beta amyloids (Raj et al, 2012) or changes in network connectivity contributing to disease vulnerability or diagnosis (Zhou et al, 2012;Ortiz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work investigating structural or functional connectomes primarily focused on modeling specific aspects of disease progression, such as diffusive spread of misfolded tau and beta amyloids (Raj et al, 2012) or changes in network connectivity contributing to disease vulnerability or diagnosis (Zhou et al, 2012;Ortiz et al, 2015). More recent work has begun using the connectome to simulate disease states in silico, for example by modifying connection weights in a simulated functional connectome to predict changes in functional activation and connectivity in the brain (Peraza-Goicolea et al, 2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between structural pathology and behavioral pathology supported the notion that network degeneration is a contributing factor to disease pathology (Vanasse et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%