2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccas.2015.7364800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and dynamic analysis of the biped robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, only 2 degrees of freedom (DOF) were considered: 1 DOF for the hip joint and 1 for the knee [ 39 , 57 – 62 ]. Moreover, the base was assumed fixed, making it two serial-link manipulators in which one manipulator is moved 180° out of phase with the other one [ 61 64 ]. The average thigh clearance given in the literature for a man is 0.78 in, and for women, 0.90 in [ 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, only 2 degrees of freedom (DOF) were considered: 1 DOF for the hip joint and 1 for the knee [ 39 , 57 – 62 ]. Moreover, the base was assumed fixed, making it two serial-link manipulators in which one manipulator is moved 180° out of phase with the other one [ 61 64 ]. The average thigh clearance given in the literature for a man is 0.78 in, and for women, 0.90 in [ 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input signals were the position error e(t) and velocity error e (t) of the joints generated from comparing quantities that define the robot's motion trajectory represented by the joint coordinates qd and their derivative d q , with response values of the corresponding quantities, q, q . These quantities were determined according to Equation (13). The output signal of the controller was the value of driving moments U(t) at the driven joints, which ensured the motion trajectory of the robot-i.e., with the errors e(t), e (t) as small as possible, relative to the desired value-and ensures the relative equilibrium.…”
Section: The Input Output Signals and Physical Value Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…q. These quantities were determined according to Equation (13). The output signal of the controller was the value of driving moments U(t) at the driven joints, which ensured the motion trajectory of the robot-i.e., with the errors e(t), .…”
Section: The Input Output Signals and Physical Value Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En la construcción del prototipo de robot equino se consideró el análisis cinemático como el primer paso para describir el modelo geométrico en forma paramétrica. [1] En ésta construcción al igual que en un modelo industrial se presentaron errores de fabricación en el mecanizado y acople de eslabones y actuadores que generaron discrepancias entre los parámetros de diseño y la estructura física, por lo cual se buscó la identificación de los modelos individuales de la cadena cinemática con el fin de aproximarse a los parámetros reales y así tener un buen rendimiento del prototipo desde el punto de vista de la precisión de posicionamiento [2], [3] Con el fin establecer un comportamiento acertado del prototipo propuesto que desencadene en la obtención de la información de ubicación de cada una de las partes mecánicas del robot se utilizó la metodología de Denavit-Hartenberg y se deja el estudio presente como base para estudios posteriores del análisis dinámico de trayectorias y de control [4], [5] Adicionalmente se consideró como efector final la nariz del modelo (punto de control de rienda sobre un equino real) y a partir de la base (sistema de referencia) obtener la relación entre todos los subsistemas partiendo del eslabón cero hasta el punto central del efector final "TCP" [6].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified