2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model structures of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit NR1 explain the molecular recognition of agonist and antagonist ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This imbalance reflects the greater difficulty of crystallizing antagonist-bound forms of iGluRs. Although the available agonist and antagonist structures provided a starting point for modeling additional receptor subtypes and ligand complexes (Foucaud et al, 2003;Pentikainen et al, 2003;Moretti et al, 2004), they are limited in their usefulness by the conformational flexibility of iGluR ligand binding cores, for which domain closure varies with both ligand and iGluR subtype (Mayer, 2005b), and also by the complex network of solvent molecules that plays a key role in ligand binding but that it is difficult to model without previous structural knowledge (Armstrong and Gouaux, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This imbalance reflects the greater difficulty of crystallizing antagonist-bound forms of iGluRs. Although the available agonist and antagonist structures provided a starting point for modeling additional receptor subtypes and ligand complexes (Foucaud et al, 2003;Pentikainen et al, 2003;Moretti et al, 2004), they are limited in their usefulness by the conformational flexibility of iGluR ligand binding cores, for which domain closure varies with both ligand and iGluR subtype (Mayer, 2005b), and also by the complex network of solvent molecules that plays a key role in ligand binding but that it is difficult to model without previous structural knowledge (Armstrong and Gouaux, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) (Yamakura and Shimoh 1999;Cull-Candy et al 2001;Moretti et al 2004). Despite their physical separation, glutamate and Glycine B binding sites functionally interact (Danysz and Parsons 1998).…”
Section: Introduction: Glutamatergic Transmission and Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous docking studies have been previously performed based on a single (crystal or homology) protein structure1920212223242526. Nevertheless, NMDARs are highly flexible per se as illustrated by published crystal structures, namely GluN1 in co-complexes with glycine (PDB code: 1PB7), 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid (DCKA) (PDB code: 1PBQ), and cycloleucine (PDB code: 1Y1M)2728.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%