1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(99)01216-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of carbon nanotube growth through chemical vapor deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

15
269
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 531 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
15
269
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Transmission electron microscope ͑TEM͒ images of catalyst particles at the ends of the nanotubes have been used to show that diameter of nanotubes is determined by initial catalyst particle size. 2,13,14 A similar conclusion has been presented based on the diameter of grown nanotubes ͑d͒ and the nearly monodisperse initial Fe catalyst size ͑R͒. 15 Meanwhile, no relationship has been established between particle size and nanotube diameter grown on isolated Fe nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Transmission electron microscope ͑TEM͒ images of catalyst particles at the ends of the nanotubes have been used to show that diameter of nanotubes is determined by initial catalyst particle size. 2,13,14 A similar conclusion has been presented based on the diameter of grown nanotubes ͑d͒ and the nearly monodisperse initial Fe catalyst size ͑R͒. 15 Meanwhile, no relationship has been established between particle size and nanotube diameter grown on isolated Fe nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…9,10 There has been significant effort focused on understanding the growth mechanisms of CNTs, including the study of how the size and structure of the catalyst particles ͑typically Ni, Fe, or Co͒ affect the growth. [9][10][11][12][13] Many different techniques are used for the preparation of suitable substrates. 12,14,15 To date the formation of suitable catalyst substrates for CNT growth is accomplished by thermal annealing of thin films deposited by magnetron sputtering 12 or thermal evaporation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of this compound lies in its high toxicity; on the other hand, methane is a good alternative because it has low toxicity, it is less expensive, and it produces either multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [13] or SWCNTs [14]. Mesoporous cobalt-based catalysts are of great interest due to their high selectivity towards SWCNTs, which is related to the ability of the MCM-41 porous structure to control the cobalt particle size inside pores with small diameters (<5 nm), responsible for the diameter of a carbon nanotube (CNT) [15] and the selectivity towards SWCNTs, which only grows over metal particles with a small size [16]. Most studies use carbon monoxide as a carbon source, but methane, being more accessible, could substitute CO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%