1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1384-1076(96)00007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model independent predictions of big bang nucleosynthesis from He and Li: consistency and implications

Abstract: We examine in detail how BBN theory is constrained, and what predictions it can make, when using only the most model-independent observational constraints. We avoid the uncertainties and model-dependencies that necessarily arise when solar neighborhood D and 3 He abundances are used to infer primordial D and 3 He via chemical and stellar evolution models. Instead, we use 4 He and 7 Li, thoroughly examining the effects of possible systematic errors in each. Via a likelihood analysis, we find near perfect agreem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
81
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we have added the additional uncertainty for fear that the 7 Li in halo stars might have been supplemented (by production in cosmic-ray interactions) or depleted (in stars) [16]. 2…”
Section: A Current Status Of Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we have added the additional uncertainty for fear that the 7 Li in halo stars might have been supplemented (by production in cosmic-ray interactions) or depleted (in stars) [16]. 2…”
Section: A Current Status Of Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SBBN these constraints lead to a baryon density i n the narrow range 10 In our third set we consider the case for low in SBBN [13]. (See Fig.…”
Section: Constraints Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons it was argued [7,8] that the analysis comparing BBN theory and observations should be based primarily on the two isotopes which are the least sensitive to the effects of evolution, namely, 4 He and 7 Li. In [8], the baryon-to-photon ratio, η was determined on the basis of a likelihood analysis using 4 He and 7 Li. Because of the monotonic dependence of 4 He on η, the 4 He likelihood distribution has a single (but relatively broad) peak at η 10 = 1.75.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When D/H from quasar absorption systems (those showing a high value for D/H [22]) is included in the analysis this range is cut to 1.50 < η 10 < 2.55. In [8], the range in η from the likelihood analysis was translated into a range for N ν . Because of the agreement between the likelihood predictions of 4 He and 7 Li for N ν = 3, the best fit value was found to be very close to N ν = 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%