2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.22.436489
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model estimates of metazoans’ contributions to the biological carbon pump

Abstract: Diel vertical migration of fish and other metazoans actively transports organic carbon from the ocean surface to depth, contributing to the biological carbon pump. Here, we use a global vertical migration model to estimate global carbon fluxes and sequestration by fish and metazoans due to respiration, fecal pellets, and deadfalls. We estimate that fish and metazoans contribute 5.2 PgC/yr (2.1-8.8PgC/yr) to passive export out of the euphotic zone. Together with active transport, we estimate that fish are respo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biological carbon pump is composed of several pathways (Boyd et al 2019), chief of which are (i) the biological gravitational pump, that is, the passive sinking of particulate organic matter (POM; Boyd et al 2019), and (ii) the migrant pump, that is, the active transport of carbon by daily or seasonally vertically migrating organisms (Bianchi et al 2013; Jónasdóttir et al 2015). It is becoming increasingly clear that passive sinking of detrital particles is not the only component of the biological pump, and that metazoans play a major role in setting both its strength (how much carbon leaves the euphotic zone) and efficiency (what depths carbon leaving the euphotic zone reaches) (Davison et al 2013; Henson et al 2019; Cavan and Hill 2022; Pinti et al 2021 b ; Saba et al 2021; Serra‐Pompei et al 2021).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological carbon pump is composed of several pathways (Boyd et al 2019), chief of which are (i) the biological gravitational pump, that is, the passive sinking of particulate organic matter (POM; Boyd et al 2019), and (ii) the migrant pump, that is, the active transport of carbon by daily or seasonally vertically migrating organisms (Bianchi et al 2013; Jónasdóttir et al 2015). It is becoming increasingly clear that passive sinking of detrital particles is not the only component of the biological pump, and that metazoans play a major role in setting both its strength (how much carbon leaves the euphotic zone) and efficiency (what depths carbon leaving the euphotic zone reaches) (Davison et al 2013; Henson et al 2019; Cavan and Hill 2022; Pinti et al 2021 b ; Saba et al 2021; Serra‐Pompei et al 2021).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, fish, jellyfish and other animals larger than zooplankton perform diel vertical migrations, but had not generally been considered as part of the diel vertical migration pump. However, these organisms may actively transport significant amounts of carbon from the EZ deep into the TZ, and thus contribute to the diel vertical migration pump (Pinti et al, 2021). Studies based on acoustic sensors carried by gliders (Reiss et al, 2021) or USV (saildrones) (De Robertis et al, 2021) have showcased the potential of this approach to monitor macrozooplankton or fish.…”
Section: Diel Vertical Migration Pumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies based on acoustic sensors carried by gliders (Reiss et al, 2021) or USV (saildrones) (De Robertis et al, 2021) have showcased the potential of this approach to monitor macrozooplankton or fish. Such technological advances may become tools of choice for characterizing diel vertical migrations of large organisms, but their role is not explicitly considered in the remainder of this paper or included in Figure 1 because the study advocating it (Pinti et al, 2021) has not been published in peer-reviewed literature as yet.…”
Section: Diel Vertical Migration Pumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increases in shallow epipelagic prey density were related to relatively shallow and dense (high echo energy) DSLs, which is in agreement with the findings of Fielding et al (2012) that acoustic backscattering intensity was positively related to the number of fish schools. This association can be explained by the strong coupling, via DVM and ontogenesis, between highly dynamic shallow water biomass (in the form of ephemeral schools and larvae/juveniles) and mesopelagic biomass (Pinti et al, 2021).…”
Section: King Penguin Preymentioning
confidence: 99%