2021
DOI: 10.1590/1516-731320210014
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Despite the ubiquity of models in science education, there are several different conceptions about their nature in the scientific community. We sought to investigate understandings about them conveyed in the recent research in science education. To this end, we have reviewed papers published on models and modelling between 2010 and 2019. Our analysis revealed that these different notions on the concept of model could be represented in three main trends: Concrete, Construct and Mathematical. In addition, we fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(47 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These processes include learning science's contents, practices and nature (Hodson, 2014). However, there is no single, universally accepted definition of a scientific model, but several distinct understandings (Krapas et al, 1997;Machado & Fernandes, 2021), mostly influenced by ideas drawn from psychological and philosophical frameworks (Justi & Gilbert, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes include learning science's contents, practices and nature (Hodson, 2014). However, there is no single, universally accepted definition of a scientific model, but several distinct understandings (Krapas et al, 1997;Machado & Fernandes, 2021), mostly influenced by ideas drawn from psychological and philosophical frameworks (Justi & Gilbert, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%