2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile measuring system based on LabVIEW for pig body components estimation in a large-scale farm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation accuracy of this model is higher than the projection method [ 14 ], the 2D image method [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], and the ellipse fitting method [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], as this model estimates pig weight and body size based on the height and distance of all points in a 3D image rather than the individual information points extracted by these other methods. The accuracy is same when using the 3D image method [ 9 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], but the processing operation of the model is simpler. The estimation accuracy of pig weight and body size cannot be further improved because pig weight changes with eating, drinking, and excretion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimation accuracy of this model is higher than the projection method [ 14 ], the 2D image method [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], and the ellipse fitting method [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], as this model estimates pig weight and body size based on the height and distance of all points in a 3D image rather than the individual information points extracted by these other methods. The accuracy is same when using the 3D image method [ 9 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], but the processing operation of the model is simpler. The estimation accuracy of pig weight and body size cannot be further improved because pig weight changes with eating, drinking, and excretion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this method is more promising than the 2D image method. The mean absolute error (MAE) of estimating pig body size for this method is 1.44–5.81% [ 9 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Ellipse fitting method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, weight monitoring, with a relative error of around 3%, was achieved as pigs walked freely under a camera (without having to restrain the animals in any way). Hence, recent technological advances have enabled easy monitoring and estimation of pig fattening from images [154,155].…”
Section: Animal Performances and Feed Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, as an alternative solution, the computer vision and AI based approaches start to attract interests, which has been used to automatically score pigs posture [6], recognise aggressive episodes of pigs [7] [8], estimate pig body components [9], predict tail-biting, fouling and diarrhoea in pigs [10], predict stress in piglets [11,12], count pigs [13], track outdoor animal [14], recognise feeding behavior [15], estimate pig weights from images [16], detect pigs in camera images [17], and measure pig body size [18]. For these approaches, only a few cameras are needed at specific places to identify and monitor the animals and the cost of the system has much less dependency on the number of pigs, which is especially attractive for large farms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%