2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile health applications for atrial fibrillation: A readability and quality assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although numerous apps related to the detection or management of AF exist, recent reviews have found that these apps vary in quality [40] and accuracy [21]. A recent review of 102 apps for patients with AF available on from Apple or Google Play found that the majority of the apps included information about AF and AF detection, and a quarter to a third of apps included symptom journals or medication reminders, and 1 app included a patient support community [40]. A quarter depended on an additional device [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although numerous apps related to the detection or management of AF exist, recent reviews have found that these apps vary in quality [40] and accuracy [21]. A recent review of 102 apps for patients with AF available on from Apple or Google Play found that the majority of the apps included information about AF and AF detection, and a quarter to a third of apps included symptom journals or medication reminders, and 1 app included a patient support community [40]. A quarter depended on an additional device [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of 102 apps for patients with AF available on from Apple or Google Play found that the majority of the apps included information about AF and AF detection, and a quarter to a third of apps included symptom journals or medication reminders, and 1 app included a patient support community [40]. A quarter depended on an additional device [40]. The review did not report which apps included functionality allowing patients to communicate directly with their health care teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, a multidisciplinary effort by regulatory agencies, healthcare organizations, and app stores is required to improve relevance, scientific validity, and readability of AF apps for AF patients. [44] Additionally, discussions with insurance companies about reimbursement of mHealth infrastructures and with different stakeholders to agree on security and privacy regulations are initiated in different countries. [31,45] 7 | CONCLUSION Health tools in the management of AF are becoming indispensable in current healthcare.…”
Section: Further Challenges For Implementation Of Mhealth In Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One large area of innovation is in engaging patients in mobile health. Although currently there are over 100,000 apps to download from the Google Play and Apple App stores, very few have been studied in randomized controlled trials [ 17 ], and the apps are written at a grade level higher than the reading level of the patients [ 18 ]. The strength of using mobile health technology lies in its ability to engage the patient via customized interventions [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%