Mobile App-Based Interventions to Support Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Identify Functions Associated with Glycemic Efficacy

Abstract

BackgroundMobile health apps for diabetes self-management have different functions. However, the efficacy and safety of each function are not well studied, and no classification is available for these functions.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to (1) develop and validate a taxonomy of apps for diabetes self-management, (2) investigate the glycemic efficacy of mobile app-based interventions among adults with diabetes in a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and (3) explore the contribution of different function to the effectiveness of entire app-based interventions using the taxonomy.MethodsWe developed a 3-axis taxonomy with columns of clinical modules, rows of functional modules and cells of functions with risk assessments. This taxonomy was validated by reviewing and classifying commercially available diabetes apps. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2007 to May 2016. We included RCTs of adult outpatients with diabetes that compared using mobile app-based interventions with usual care alone. The mean differences (MDs) in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) concentrations and risk ratios of adverse events were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. After taxonomic classification, we performed exploratory subgroup analyses of the presence or absence of each module across the included app-based interventions.ResultsAcross 12 included trials involving 974 participants, using app-based interventions was associated with a clinically significant reduction of HbA1c (MD 0.48%, 95% CI 0.19%-0.78%) without excess adverse events. Larger HbA1c reductions were noted among patients with type 2 diabetes than those with type 1 diabetes (MD 0.67%, 95% CI 0.30%-1.03% vs MD 0.37%, 95% CI –0.12%-0.86%). Having a complication prevention module in app-based interventions was associated with a greater HbA1c reduction (with complication prevention: MD 1.31%, 95% CI 0.66%-1.96% vs without: MD 0.38%, 95% CI 0.09%-0.67%; intersubgroup P=.01), as was having a structured display (with structured display: MD 0.69%, 95% CI 0.32%-1.06% vs without: MD 0.69%, 95% CI –0.18%-0.53%; intersubgroup P=.03). However, having a clinical decision-making function was not associated with a larger HbA1c reduction (with clinical decision making: MD 0.19%, 95% CI –0.24%-0.63% vs without: MD 0.61%, 95% CI 0.27%-0.95%; intersubgroup P=.14).ConclusionsThe use of mobile app-based interventions yields a clinically significant HbA1c reduction among adult outpatients with diabetes, especially among those with type 2 diabetes. Our study suggests that the clinical decision-making function needs further improvement and evaluation before being added to apps.

Health Care Professionals� Attitudes Toward, and Experiences of Using, a Culture-Sensitive Smartphone App for Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Qualitative Study (Preprint)

“…There is growing evidence on the impact of mHealth interventions for the management of diabetes [23,32]. Given the many different mHealth tools, the most effective method and setting for the management of GDM are still under discussion [33].…”

“…mHealth technologies can potentially serve as a new tool for managing disease and promoting healthy behaviour [20]. There is increasing evidence that mHealth interventions help patients to control their blood sugar levels [21][22][23] and elicit patient engagement [24]. However, two systematic reviews on health professionals' acceptance found divergent results [25,26].…”

Combining technology and research to prevent scald injuries: results from Cool Runnings randomised controlled trial (Preprint)

“…Participants from Queensland, Australia were recruited Eligibility criteria were: females aged 18+, who resided in Queensland, Australia, and had at least one child aged [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] months at enrolment. Ownership of a smartphone was required for intervention delivery.…”

“…Increasingly, apps are being used by health agencies and researchers to gather and present information to study participants and the general public. There is a growing body of evidence showing the successful use of smartphone apps to encourage healthy habits such as increasing physical activity [3] and promoting weight loss [4], managing chronic disease [5,6], and delivering mental health programs [7]. One area that…”

Change in Patient Comfort Using Mobile Phones Following the Use of an App to Monitor Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence: Longitudinal Study (Preprint)

“…These mHealth interventions have been applied to monitoring postoperative care [2,3], diabetes self-management [4,5], smoking cessation [6,7], care and prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases [8], and more. As these interventions begin to spread throughout healthcare, there has been a growing interest in the response to these applications, including topics such as acceptability and feasibility [2], satisfaction by patients and providers [5], and efficiency [4]. However, there is limited research measuring users' comfort in operating smartphone functions, and whether comfort increases as a result of engagement with these applications.…”