2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing, scalar boundedness, and numerical dissipation in large-eddy simulations

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights • Methods to enforce scalar boundedness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flows examined in this paper are temporally evolving counter-flow turbulent shear layers, in a domain of length , and periodic boundary conditions in all three directions (Matheou & Dimotakis 2016; Sharan et al. 2018 a ). The domain extent is .…”
Section: Flow Configuration and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Flows examined in this paper are temporally evolving counter-flow turbulent shear layers, in a domain of length , and periodic boundary conditions in all three directions (Matheou & Dimotakis 2016; Sharan et al. 2018 a ). The domain extent is .…”
Section: Flow Configuration and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate this problem, the monotonicity-preserving method discussed in Sharan et al. (2018 a ) is used at global scalar bounds.…”
Section: Flow Configuration and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Turbulent free-shear flow computations are sensitive to the choices of initial/inflow conditions, domain size and numerical discretization (Balaras, Piomelli & Wallace 2001; Mattner 2011; Sharan, Matheou & Dimotakis 2018 a ). In particular, several experimental (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%