Adult Lives
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1t895q0.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
263
0
21

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
263
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Topics covered included knowledge and use of condoms, sexual activities and protective behaviour, potential partners, sexual harassment, characteristic of paying and non-paying partners, risk of sexual behaviour and reason for utilization and non-utilisation of sexual and reproductive health services. Interviewing is appropriate in situations where sensitive issues are addressed (Mason 2006). Conducting semi-structured interviews allowed the researcher to hold some element of control over the line of questioning (van Teijlingen & Forrest 2004: 171), whilst still leaving scope for respondents to cover issues not directly addressed in the interview schedule.…”
Section: Study Sample and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topics covered included knowledge and use of condoms, sexual activities and protective behaviour, potential partners, sexual harassment, characteristic of paying and non-paying partners, risk of sexual behaviour and reason for utilization and non-utilisation of sexual and reproductive health services. Interviewing is appropriate in situations where sensitive issues are addressed (Mason 2006). Conducting semi-structured interviews allowed the researcher to hold some element of control over the line of questioning (van Teijlingen & Forrest 2004: 171), whilst still leaving scope for respondents to cover issues not directly addressed in the interview schedule.…”
Section: Study Sample and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of data instruments used in cultural policy, for example, the prioritisation of quantitative methods based on the sample survey -such as the UK government's national Taking Part survey -involves the reduction of the cultural field to a partial and specific set of measurable indicators that both represent and help to reinforce particular ways of "seeing" participation (see Bunting, Gilmore, & Miles, in press;Taylor, 2016). Accordingly, UEP's work is set out according to a non-hierarchical, mixed methods design, in which different approaches, offering different lenses and therefore fields of view on the domain of cultural participation, are brought into dialogue with one another (Mason, 2006). A set of macro-level histories examining the terms, narratives and assumptions constructing present-day notions of participation, value and cultural governance (Belfiore & Gibson, in press) is being mobilised alongside the reanalysis of existing participation data (Leguina & Miles, in press;Taylor, 2016) to frame an extensive programme of new empirical work in six UK locations.…”
Section: Everyday Participation and Cultural Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, the qualitative aspect enables us to obtain more detailed information, as it allows us to collect emerging ratings that were not envisaged in the closed questionnaire (Mason, 2006).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesmentioning
confidence: 99%