2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed mode I/II/III fatigue crack growth in S355 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An initial velocity of 715 m/s and a mass of 7.9 g for the projectile, including Materials 2020, 13, 769 7 of 21 3.6 g for the steel core, were assumed. The projectile geometry was taken from a previous study [42], while some parameters of the core damage from other work [43] were taken into account.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial velocity of 715 m/s and a mass of 7.9 g for the projectile, including Materials 2020, 13, 769 7 of 21 3.6 g for the steel core, were assumed. The projectile geometry was taken from a previous study [42], while some parameters of the core damage from other work [43] were taken into account.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is quite evident that a combination of modes I and II (shear mode), hereafter referred to as the mixed mode I/II loading condition, often acts on structural members that can lead to fatigue crack initiation and propagation up to the failure of fatigue-critical structural members [17,18]. Although some research studies have been conducted on the mixed mode I/II fatigue behavior of bare (unstrengthened) mild steel [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], which is relevant for civil structural applications, only a few studies can be found in the literature on the mixed mode I/II fatigue strengthening of steel members, which typically dealt with nonprestressed CFRP patching of steel plates with inclined starter notches [27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that rolling direction corresponds to purposed direction of loading (fatigue cracks initiate and grow perpendicularly to the loading direction), see [9]. Note that previous work on S355 [10,11,12] S355 J2 [13] or S355 J0 [14,15] showed that the fatigue crack propagation rate seems to be independent of the rolling direction and resulting microstructure. Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Data Processing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 93%