2006
DOI: 10.1291/hypres.29.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mistyping of Angiotensinogen M235T Alleles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, misclassification of the AGT (M235T) genotype should also be considered, as has been indicated recently. 31 However, this is less likely an explanation in our study, as the extensive validation process of the multiplex assay did not result in discordant cases for the AGT (M235T) polymorphism.…”
Section: Allele Frequenciescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In addition, misclassification of the AGT (M235T) genotype should also be considered, as has been indicated recently. 31 However, this is less likely an explanation in our study, as the extensive validation process of the multiplex assay did not result in discordant cases for the AGT (M235T) polymorphism.…”
Section: Allele Frequenciescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This is also suggested by Schunkert et al [39] who hypothesized that the difference between males and females is rather a genetic alternation than an effect induced by blood pressure. Another explanation might be the recently indicated misclassification of the AGT (M235 T) genotype [42]. However, in our study the validation process of our multiplex assay did not reveal discordant results for this polymorphism.…”
Section: Males Femalescontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…However, the results have been inconsistent. There have been a number of studies that have confirmed a positive association between M235T variants and hypertension (6)(7)(8), but certain studies have confirmed a lack of significant effect of the AGT M235T polymorphism (9,10). This means that different populations may have a different AGT M235T polymorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%