2017
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1346-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Recent studies of visual search suggest that learning about valued outcomes (rewards and punishments) influences the likelihood that distractors will capture spatial attention and slow search for a target, even when those value-related distractors have never themselves been the targets of search. In the present study, we demonstrated a related effect in the context of temporal, rather than spatial, selection. Participants were presented with a temporal stream of pictures in a fixed central location and had to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
36
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent experiment by Le Pelley et al [67] showed using a RSVP task that distractors associated with reward only affect target detection under conditions of CA, results that somehow clash with our findings. However, in their task, the conditioning procedure was embedded within the RSVP instead of occurring previously and separately.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…A recent experiment by Le Pelley et al [67] showed using a RSVP task that distractors associated with reward only affect target detection under conditions of CA, results that somehow clash with our findings. However, in their task, the conditioning procedure was embedded within the RSVP instead of occurring previously and separately.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The ability of implicit reward-CS associations to produce hedonic and attentional responses has generated an extensive discussion (Lovibond and Shanks 2002), with research showing inconsistent results. Recent findings (Le Pelley et al 2017), as well as previous research (i.e., Hogarth et al 2005Hogarth et al , 2006a, appear to show that CA is necessary for the development of responses in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. These results may stem from the inadequacy of procedures used to assess learning, both in the measurement of conditioned responses (De Houwer 2006) and CA (Lovibond and Shanks 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Moreover, the amount of interference increased with the size of the associated value, independent of participants' explicit knowledge about stimulus-reward relationships. This value-driven attentional capture (VDAC) has been consistently reported under other experimental manipulations using different types of stimulus features other than color, such as auditory stimuli (Anderson, 2015a), Gabor orientations (Laurent et al, 2015), neutral exogenous cues (Failing and Theeuwes, 2014), singleton distractors (Le , onset distractors (Munneke et al, 2016), or scenic pictures in a visual stream (Le Pelley et al, 2017). Importantly, these considerable amounts of evidence for VDAC by different stimulus features are commonly based on the relationships between features and their associated reward (Anderson, 2013(Anderson, , 2016Bucker and Theeuwes, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%