2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60849-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misleading report on clinical trials in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strong concern has been expressed in the lay press that these figures for trial-related deaths are underestimates (Srinivasan, 2013). Ethical concerns were strongly expressed not only in the lay press (Datta, 2013) but also in medical journals with worldwide coverage (Sugarman et al, 2013;Yee, 2012), although specific allegations were robustly refuted by site investigators (Pauranik et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussion: Developments In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong concern has been expressed in the lay press that these figures for trial-related deaths are underestimates (Srinivasan, 2013). Ethical concerns were strongly expressed not only in the lay press (Datta, 2013) but also in medical journals with worldwide coverage (Sugarman et al, 2013;Yee, 2012), although specific allegations were robustly refuted by site investigators (Pauranik et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussion: Developments In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no restriction in the ICMR guidelines on principal investigators also being members of ECs, [34] and this could potentially lead to conflicts of interest. A survey covering 20 ECs in India revealed deficiencies in composition, quorum, and review of insurance documents and clinical trial agreements, reinforcing the need for providing specific training to EC members.…”
Section: Ethics Committees and Institutional Review Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%