Early detection and swift treatment, when achievable, may significantly affect prognosis in lung cancer patients. Therefore, individuals with a high risk for lung cancer are invited to participate into international screening programs, such as the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP). An undesirable consequence of such massive enterprises is the detection of pulmonary nodules also in subjects who are unlikely to ultimately die from lung cancer. Nevertheless, the individuals with pulmonary nodule undergo stringent diagnostic procedures to assess the nature of the lesion. This implies a noticeable (physical and emotional) stress for our patients and the likelihood of overdiagnosis and, potentially, consequent overtreatment. Molecular markers, more specifically, microRNAs, might significantly add value to the workup process aiming at the distinction between benign and malignant lesions and, among the malignant ones, those concretely threatening for the patients' survival. We are confident that such a multidisciplinary approach would better suit our patients' diagnostic and/or therapeutic, actual needs.J. Cell. Physiol. 226: 2213-2214, 2011. ß 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer death in Western countries (Herbst et al., 2008;Jemal et al., 2009). Currently, less than 20% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed with a locally confined disease, while locally advanced and disseminated lung cancer still account for the greatest majority of incident cases. As a result, the 5-year survival for all stages combined is 15% (Jemal et al., 2009 A relevant criticism has been addressed to the I-ELCAP study methodology and, in general, to the risk of overdiagnosis (and often overtreatment) which can arise in this kind of massive screenings (Bach et al., 2007;Welch et al., 2007;Bach, 2008b;Reich, 2008;Toyoda et al., 2008;Welch and Black, 2010). This screening generated a remarkable body of evidence on the morphologic features of pulmonary lesions of indeterminate origin, being one single, non-calcified lung nodule detectable in as much as 20% of the screened participants . Essentially, for the optimal management of the patient with LDCT-detected pulmonary nodules, the key questions are: (a) whether these pulmonary lesions would be benign or malignant; (b) if malignant, at what extent they would be life-threatening for the patient; and, consequently, (c) if specific determinations could address the patient toward a definite therapeutic protocol. This emerges as increasingly important in the light of novel natural history models prospected for lung cancer (Bach, 2008a). Thus far, the achievement of a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer appears difficult and challenging, when issued from the sole imaging parameters. Thus, once positive to the screening, patients undergo a stringent, complex and often risky diagnostic schedule. These procedures can imply further, and sometimes repetitive, dangerous radiation exposure for medical imaging (Fazel et al., 2009;Marshall, 2010)