2003
Minoxidil vs Finasteride in the Treatment of Men With Androgenetic Alopecia
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
37
5
4
3
Citation Types
1
27
0
1
Year Published
2000
2026
Publication Types
Select...
34
13
1
Relationship
0
48
Authors
Journals
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
References 3 publications
1
27
0
1
“…This was an open, randomized and comparative study aiming to compare the efficacy of oral finasteride and/or topical minoxidil in MAGA after12 months treatment. Oral finasteride at 1 mg/day yielded better outcome than topical 5% minoxidil used twice/day, in accordance with previous researches (10,11). The combined medication took effect faster, and was superior to monotherapies during the whole course of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This was an open, randomized and comparative study aiming to compare the efficacy of oral finasteride and/or topical minoxidil in MAGA after12 months treatment. Oral finasteride at 1 mg/day yielded better outcome than topical 5% minoxidil used twice/day, in accordance with previous researches (10,11). The combined medication took effect faster, and was superior to monotherapies during the whole course of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This trial, which studied female participants with pattern hair loss, was included to allow for a connected network for the 24‐week change in IOA outcome. Study‐level summary of the included trials' characteristics is presented in Table 1 [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Each study's risk of bias is presented in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trial, which studied female participants with pattern hair loss, was included to allow for a connected network for the 24‐week change in IOA outcome. Study‐level summary of the included trials' characteristics is presented in Table 1 [12–44]. Each study's risk of bias is presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our search yielded 848 records (Figure 1); after the 2 stages of screening, 23 studies were eligible for quantitative analyses (Figure 1). Details from the eligible studies are presented in the Table; 2 were single-arm (ie, observational) studies, whereas the remaining 21 were randomized trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
