2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniperc? No, Thank You!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this, the diameter of the tool was decreased; mini-PNL, using needles with sizes of 12-20 Fr, was developed (17). It has been demonstrated that compared to standard PNL, mini-PNL results in lower hemorrhage rates and shorter hospital stays (11,18). Furthermore, Bader et al (13) have provided a reliable and effective method for direct entry into kidney stones under direct vision by means of an "all-seeing needle," which is the optical imaging system with the smallest diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, the diameter of the tool was decreased; mini-PNL, using needles with sizes of 12-20 Fr, was developed (17). It has been demonstrated that compared to standard PNL, mini-PNL results in lower hemorrhage rates and shorter hospital stays (11,18). Furthermore, Bader et al (13) have provided a reliable and effective method for direct entry into kidney stones under direct vision by means of an "all-seeing needle," which is the optical imaging system with the smallest diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its most important disadvantage is a longer operation time. [7] Preexisting stones should be fragmented into minute particles so as to extract them through the access sheath or to ensure their passage out of the urinary tract. In the literature, the mean operation time for microperc has been reported to range between 45 and 128 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uspoređujući efikasnost standardnog i miniPCNL-a nema razlike u SFR-u, broj komplikacija je niži kod miniPCNL-a, dok je broj dodatnih procedura veći kod miniPCNL-a 13,14 . Također, miniPCNL traje dulje (155 prema 106 minuta) 15 . Uspoređujući ESWL i miniPCNL vidljlivo je kako je SFR niži kod ESWL-a, ali je i broj komplikacija manji kod izvantjelesnog mrvljenja kamenca [16][17][18] .…”
Section: Raspravaunclassified